Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

In the Spotlight: Beware of 'Lite' Indemnification

By Randolph M. Perkins
August 30, 2007

Some commercial landlords consider indemnification clauses in leases to constitute mere 'legal boilerplate' that do not merit attention from a business perspective. Some lawyers, feeling pressure to minimize the length of lease documents, may seize upon this clause as an opportunity to save space. As a result, it is not uncommon to encounter abbreviated indemnification clauses. At first glance, the language appears suitable. However, when put to the test, these 'lite' clauses often leave landlords unsatisfied. This article demonstrates the value of 'kicking it up a notch' by including ingredients called for in the recipe but often left out of the mix.

Sample 'Lite' Clause

Few landlords are willing to forego indemnity protection from tenants. However, when presented with the following clause, many landlords ' and perhaps some attorneys ' would feel comfortable.

Tenant shall indemnify and hold Landlord harmless against, and defend Landlord from, * all obligations, actions, assessments, losses, liabilities, damages (including without limitation special, consequential, exemplary, punitive and similar damages), costs and expenses paid or incurred, including without limitation penalties, interest on any amount payable to a third party as a result of the foregoing and any legal or other expenses reasonably incurred in defending any claims or actions, suffered or incurred by Landlord as a result of the negligence ** of Tenant or Tenant's employees, agents and invitees. *** ****

This seems like pretty comprehensive protection ' especially given the length of the sentence. Not so. It leaves unanswered many questions to which landlords want answers when the clause becomes operative. For illustrative purposes, the sample clause above has been marked with asterisks to indicate spots that are relevant to these questions. The same clause, refined by the changes discussed in the following section, appears in the box to the right.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.