Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When my jury summons arrived in the mailbox, I decided that performing my civic duty could function as professional development for this legal-specific software trainer. The three previous times that I had served (one other time as foreperson), I viewed the experience with different eyes. After eight weeks of active, civil case jury duty, the time spent and lessons learned compel me to reflect on the experience and offer personal insight as it relates to law firm ethics and how a firm may benefit.
Pro Bono Community Support from a Different Angle
First, I encourage all law firm partners and attorneys to actively engage in conversations with their clients about whether or not they support jury service for their employees and attempt to convince clients to compensate employees who do serve. Personally, I was amazed at how many jury candidates asked to be excused due to expressed economic hardship. One can undoubtedly understand how self-employed consultants, like myself, do find that time spent away from client development, servicing, and contracts in motion is difficult to achieve. In my case, I was able to notify the court of current work assignments and ask for a specific alternate date to report, which the court granted without question. Are clients who are employers aware of this rescheduling ability? Planning for an absence from work allowed me the opportunity to convey my lack of availability to my clients, and they applauded my community focus. Perhaps it is the market segment that is my client base that evoked this rich response, but one would hope that all citizens share these views. During voir dire, one (unselected) juror candidate eloquently stated, when asked about his feelings regarding jury service: 'If I ever expect to get a fair shake on that side of the table [pointing], I should expect to do my time in this jury box.'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?