Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Doctor Admits Too Much at Trial
Because the defendant doctor judicially admitted both negligence and causation, it was not reversible error for the court to admit the testimony of an expert who might not be qualified to testify, as such testimony was merely cumulative. Medina v. Hart, '- S.W.3d ”, 2007 WL 1933041 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi) (7/5/07).
Plaintiff patient sued Marelyn Medina, MD, for injuries he sustained during surgery to remove a kidney stone. Prior to the surgery, plaintiff was positioned on the operating table so that the doctor could access the left kidney. Dr. Medina testified that she supervised the placement of an IV bag under plaintiff's arm as a cushioning device, to prevent nerve damage to his shoulder and arm. Although Dr. Medina testified that she often used IV bags for this purpose, the parties disputed whether this was a proper use. Dr. Medina performed the surgery, but was unable to remove the kidney stone. After surgery, it was discovered that plaintiff had second- and third-degree burns under his arm because the IV bag that was placed there was hot. Plaintiff has lost feeling in that area, is unable to sweat, and suffered other complications from the burns.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?