Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Verdicts

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
August 30, 2007

Doctor Admits Too Much at Trial

Because the defendant doctor judicially admitted both negligence and causation, it was not reversible error for the court to admit the testimony of an expert who might not be qualified to testify, as such testimony was merely cumulative. Medina v. Hart, '- S.W.3d ”, 2007 WL 1933041 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi) (7/5/07).

Plaintiff patient sued Marelyn Medina, MD, for injuries he sustained during surgery to remove a kidney stone. Prior to the surgery, plaintiff was positioned on the operating table so that the doctor could access the left kidney. Dr. Medina testified that she supervised the placement of an IV bag under plaintiff's arm as a cushioning device, to prevent nerve damage to his shoulder and arm. Although Dr. Medina testified that she often used IV bags for this purpose, the parties disputed whether this was a proper use. Dr. Medina performed the surgery, but was unable to remove the kidney stone. After surgery, it was discovered that plaintiff had second- and third-degree burns under his arm because the IV bag that was placed there was hot. Plaintiff has lost feeling in that area, is unable to sweat, and suffered other complications from the burns.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?