Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Jury Pays Girl Burned By Exploding Cell Phone Battery
In Johnson v. Nokia Inc., No. 04-CA-010497, Hillsborough County Circuit Court, 13th, FL, March 29, 2007, Demetrius Carter, then 15, was given a Nokia cell phone as a birthday present, but she replaced the regular battery with a light-up battery made by Leader Wireless. While waiting for the school bus, she heard a loud bang and initially thought she was shot in the leg. When she realized she was on fire, her friends attempted to beat down the flames. She sued Nokia, the store where she bought the battery, and Leader Wireless, claiming they failed to warn of the risks associated with aftermarket batteries. Nokia and the store settled before trial, and the California-based Leader Wireless failed to appear at trial. The jury awarded Carter $529,000 for the third-degree burn she suffered on her leg.
Jury Pays Girl Burned By Exploding Cell Phone Battery
In Johnson v. Nokia Inc., No. 04-CA-010497, Hillsborough County Circuit Court, 13th, FL, March 29, 2007, Demetrius Carter, then 15, was given a Nokia cell phone as a birthday present, but she replaced the regular battery with a light-up battery made by Leader Wireless. While waiting for the school bus, she heard a loud bang and initially thought she was shot in the leg. When she realized she was on fire, her friends attempted to beat down the flames. She sued Nokia, the store where she bought the battery, and Leader Wireless, claiming they failed to warn of the risks associated with aftermarket batteries. Nokia and the store settled before trial, and the California-based Leader Wireless failed to appear at trial. The jury awarded Carter $529,000 for the third-degree burn she suffered on her leg.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.