Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The IRS recently issued Notice 2007-78, which provides additional guidance and limited transition relief on Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. There are still actions required by the end of 2007.
Background
Section 409A has generally been in effect since 2005. Employers have been required to administer their nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements in accordance with Section 409A during a transition period that began in 2005. That transition period generally ends Dec. 31, 2007, except as extended in Notice 2007-78. Noncompliant arrangements may subject an employee or other service provider to income tax before any compensation is actually received, and they may result in an additional 20% penalty tax (40% in California).
Notice 2007-78
Significant effects of Notice 2007-78 are:
Written Compliance Deadline Extended to Dec. 31, 2008
Notice 2007-78 provides that nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements must generally be finally amended by Dec. 31, 2008. However, all such arrangements must operate in compliance with the final Section 409A regulations by Jan. 1, 2008.
Payment Elections Must Be Made by Year's-End
While the final amendment deadline is Dec. 31, 2008, all arrangements must specify a compliant time and form of distribution by Dec. 31, 2007. Certain noncompliant payment terms may remain in an arrangement (as long as they are not used) during 2008, provided that the payment terms used are compliant. The six-month delay provisions applicable to payments to certain 'key employees' need not be documented, as long as the plan is operated in compliance with the rule. To the extent 'good reason' definitions triggering payment do not meet the regulatory definitions in some cases they may be amended to comply. After Dec. 31, 2007, that will not generally be possible.
Operational Compliance Deadline Is Unchanged: Jan. 1, 2008
Since 2005, companies have been required to operate their nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements in good faith compliance with the transitional guidance. Full operational compliance with the final regulations is required by Jan. 1, 2008.
Elections to Change Payment Terms and Amendments to Remove an Arrangement from 409A Due By Year's-End
One of the most valuable aspects of the transition rules, the ability to change certain existing payment elections outside the more restrictive Section 409A rules or to remove an arrangement from Section 409A altogether by amendment, expires Dec. 31, 2007. These provisions permit discounted stock options to be 'fixed' by, for example, raising the exercise price to fair market value on the grant date. Such actions must be completed by year's-end.
Action Items
To ensure year's- end compliance with the Section 409A rules, employers should:
Michael T. Frank is a partner in Morrison & Foerster's Palo Alto, CA, office. He can be reached at 650-813-5627 and [email protected].
The IRS recently issued Notice 2007-78, which provides additional guidance and limited transition relief on Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. There are still actions required by the end of 2007.
Background
Section 409A has generally been in effect since 2005. Employers have been required to administer their nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements in accordance with Section 409A during a transition period that began in 2005. That transition period generally ends Dec. 31, 2007, except as extended in Notice 2007-78. Noncompliant arrangements may subject an employee or other service provider to income tax before any compensation is actually received, and they may result in an additional 20% penalty tax (40% in California).
Notice 2007-78
Significant effects of Notice 2007-78 are:
Written Compliance Deadline Extended to Dec. 31, 2008
Notice 2007-78 provides that nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements must generally be finally amended by Dec. 31, 2008. However, all such arrangements must operate in compliance with the final Section 409A regulations by Jan. 1, 2008.
Payment Elections Must Be Made by Year's-End
While the final amendment deadline is Dec. 31, 2008, all arrangements must specify a compliant time and form of distribution by Dec. 31, 2007. Certain noncompliant payment terms may remain in an arrangement (as long as they are not used) during 2008, provided that the payment terms used are compliant. The six-month delay provisions applicable to payments to certain 'key employees' need not be documented, as long as the plan is operated in compliance with the rule. To the extent 'good reason' definitions triggering payment do not meet the regulatory definitions in some cases they may be amended to comply. After Dec. 31, 2007, that will not generally be possible.
Operational Compliance Deadline Is Unchanged: Jan. 1, 2008
Since 2005, companies have been required to operate their nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements in good faith compliance with the transitional guidance. Full operational compliance with the final regulations is required by Jan. 1, 2008.
Elections to Change Payment Terms and Amendments to Remove an Arrangement from 409A Due By Year's-End
One of the most valuable aspects of the transition rules, the ability to change certain existing payment elections outside the more restrictive Section 409A rules or to remove an arrangement from Section 409A altogether by amendment, expires Dec. 31, 2007. These provisions permit discounted stock options to be 'fixed' by, for example, raising the exercise price to fair market value on the grant date. Such actions must be completed by year's-end.
Action Items
To ensure year's- end compliance with the Section 409A rules, employers should:
Michael T. Frank is a partner in
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.