Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The IRS recently issued Notice 2007-78, which provides additional guidance and limited transition relief on Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. There are still actions required by the end of 2007.
Background
Section 409A has generally been in effect since 2005. Employers have been required to administer their nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements in accordance with Section 409A during a transition period that began in 2005. That transition period generally ends Dec. 31, 2007, except as extended in Notice 2007-78. Noncompliant arrangements may subject an employee or other service provider to income tax before any compensation is actually received, and they may result in an additional 20% penalty tax (40% in California).
Notice 2007-78
Significant effects of Notice 2007-78 are:
Written Compliance Deadline Extended to Dec. 31, 2008
Notice 2007-78 provides that nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements must generally be finally amended by Dec. 31, 2008. However, all such arrangements must operate in compliance with the final Section 409A regulations by Jan. 1, 2008.
Payment Elections Must Be Made by Year's-End
While the final amendment deadline is Dec. 31, 2008, all arrangements must specify a compliant time and form of distribution by Dec. 31, 2007. Certain noncompliant payment terms may remain in an arrangement (as long as they are not used) during 2008, provided that the payment terms used are compliant. The six-month delay provisions applicable to payments to certain 'key employees' need not be documented, as long as the plan is operated in compliance with the rule. To the extent 'good reason' definitions triggering payment do not meet the regulatory definitions in some cases they may be amended to comply. After Dec. 31, 2007, that will not generally be possible.
Operational Compliance Deadline Is Unchanged: Jan. 1, 2008
Since 2005, companies have been required to operate their nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements in good faith compliance with the transitional guidance. Full operational compliance with the final regulations is required by Jan. 1, 2008.
Elections to Change Payment Terms and Amendments to Remove an Arrangement from 409A Due By Year's-End
One of the most valuable aspects of the transition rules, the ability to change certain existing payment elections outside the more restrictive Section 409A rules or to remove an arrangement from Section 409A altogether by amendment, expires Dec. 31, 2007. These provisions permit discounted stock options to be 'fixed' by, for example, raising the exercise price to fair market value on the grant date. Such actions must be completed by year's-end.
Action Items
To ensure year's- end compliance with the Section 409A rules, employers should:
Michael T. Frank is a partner in Morrison & Foerster's Palo Alto, CA, office. He can be reached at 650-813-5627 and [email protected].
The IRS recently issued Notice 2007-78, which provides additional guidance and limited transition relief on Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. There are still actions required by the end of 2007.
Background
Section 409A has generally been in effect since 2005. Employers have been required to administer their nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements in accordance with Section 409A during a transition period that began in 2005. That transition period generally ends Dec. 31, 2007, except as extended in Notice 2007-78. Noncompliant arrangements may subject an employee or other service provider to income tax before any compensation is actually received, and they may result in an additional 20% penalty tax (40% in California).
Notice 2007-78
Significant effects of Notice 2007-78 are:
Written Compliance Deadline Extended to Dec. 31, 2008
Notice 2007-78 provides that nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements must generally be finally amended by Dec. 31, 2008. However, all such arrangements must operate in compliance with the final Section 409A regulations by Jan. 1, 2008.
Payment Elections Must Be Made by Year's-End
While the final amendment deadline is Dec. 31, 2008, all arrangements must specify a compliant time and form of distribution by Dec. 31, 2007. Certain noncompliant payment terms may remain in an arrangement (as long as they are not used) during 2008, provided that the payment terms used are compliant. The six-month delay provisions applicable to payments to certain 'key employees' need not be documented, as long as the plan is operated in compliance with the rule. To the extent 'good reason' definitions triggering payment do not meet the regulatory definitions in some cases they may be amended to comply. After Dec. 31, 2007, that will not generally be possible.
Operational Compliance Deadline Is Unchanged: Jan. 1, 2008
Since 2005, companies have been required to operate their nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements in good faith compliance with the transitional guidance. Full operational compliance with the final regulations is required by Jan. 1, 2008.
Elections to Change Payment Terms and Amendments to Remove an Arrangement from 409A Due By Year's-End
One of the most valuable aspects of the transition rules, the ability to change certain existing payment elections outside the more restrictive Section 409A rules or to remove an arrangement from Section 409A altogether by amendment, expires Dec. 31, 2007. These provisions permit discounted stock options to be 'fixed' by, for example, raising the exercise price to fair market value on the grant date. Such actions must be completed by year's-end.
Action Items
To ensure year's- end compliance with the Section 409A rules, employers should:
Michael T. Frank is a partner in
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.