Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As Charles McEvily described in his introductory article Interdisciplinary Collaborative Divorce, in last month's issue of The Matrimonial Strategist, the child specialist is one member of a collaborative divorce team, which includes two attorneys, two divorce coaches, and a financial specialist. The team helps the couple reach a divorce settlement without going to court, but its purpose is more than court avoidance. Its primary goal is to help the couple define both a good settlement for the entire family and improved communication with each other in the future.
While not all collaborative attorneys use a full team as above, the child specialist's role has two major features that remain fairly constant. First, the child specialist brings into the collaborative process an expertise in child emotional and cognitive development, in temperamental differences, in the parenting styles appropriate to each and in family systems so that the clients' children remain a central concern. This expertise distinguishes the child specialist from a general mental-health practitioner and from a law guardian, either of whom may be comfortable with kids, but may not have this specific expertise.
Second, by meeting with the children, the child specialist offers them direct support and offers their parents and the collaborative team a three-dimensional view of the children, pressing the parents to reach beyond their personal turmoil and differences toward a co-parenting partnership. Many parents differ on how best to raise one or all of their children. These differences worsen under the stress of the divorce and in the mutual disappointment that forms its foundation. The child specialist identifies and speaks for the needs of the children so that the parents can refocus on their children in making decisions about their future. Thus, the settlement is informed by what the child specialist learns, facilitated by the team, but defined by the parents. Unlike a forensic specialist, the child specialist's effectiveness is grounded in the team's collaborative process and in the normal, integrative authority of the parents, not in the competitive processes of litigation or in the external authority of a judge and court.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?