Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Arbitration Ruling Is Vacated over Lack of Disclosure

By Stan Soocher
September 27, 2007

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the vacating of an arbitrator's ruling in a film-industry dispute, due to the arbitrator's 'evident partiality.' New Regency Productions Inc. v. Nippon Herald Films Inc., 05-55224. ('Evident partiality' is based on an arbitrator's lack of disclosure of his or her dealings that could result in potential bias in the arbitration.) Entertainment attorney William Immerman had ruled as arbitrator that producer New Regency owed Japanese distributor Nippon Herald $440,000, plus interest, for a film Nippon Herald had paid for but New Regency failed to deliver under a multi-picture deal. Immerman went on to side with New Regency in that, under a cross-collateralization provision, New Regency should receive recoupment funds, plus interest, that totaled $2.341 million. Immerman hadn't disclosed that, during the arbitration, he had taken a job as senior vice president and chief administrative officer of Yari Film Group, which was negotiating to finance and co-produce a movie being produced by Alexandra Milchan, a New Regency executive and daughter of New Regency CEO Arnon Milchan.

The appeals court noted in part: 'Immerman had a duty to investigate potential conflicts when he accepted a high-level executive position at Yari Film Group while the arbitration was ongoing ' The conflict alleged by Nippon Herald is real and nontrivial.'

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the vacating of an arbitrator's ruling in a film-industry dispute, due to the arbitrator's 'evident partiality.' New Regency Productions Inc. v. Nippon Herald Films Inc., 05-55224. ('Evident partiality' is based on an arbitrator's lack of disclosure of his or her dealings that could result in potential bias in the arbitration.) Entertainment attorney William Immerman had ruled as arbitrator that producer New Regency owed Japanese distributor Nippon Herald $440,000, plus interest, for a film Nippon Herald had paid for but New Regency failed to deliver under a multi-picture deal. Immerman went on to side with New Regency in that, under a cross-collateralization provision, New Regency should receive recoupment funds, plus interest, that totaled $2.341 million. Immerman hadn't disclosed that, during the arbitration, he had taken a job as senior vice president and chief administrative officer of Yari Film Group, which was negotiating to finance and co-produce a movie being produced by Alexandra Milchan, a New Regency executive and daughter of New Regency CEO Arnon Milchan.

The appeals court noted in part: 'Immerman had a duty to investigate potential conflicts when he accepted a high-level executive position at Yari Film Group while the arbitration was ongoing ' The conflict alleged by Nippon Herald is real and nontrivial.'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.