Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In an effort to level the playing field for U.S. businesses overseas, many OECD countries adopted the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions in 1998. Nearly 10 years later, the main result may have been to enlarge the playing field of U.S. law enforcement. As discussed in Michael E. Clark's companion article on the left, the 1998 amendments expanding jurisdiction of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) were just the start of what catapulted the FCPA to the forefront of today's business risks. Foreign subsidiaries of U.S. companies not otherwise subject to the FCPA are now being indicted as 'agents' of their U.S. affiliates. Meanwhile, some foreign companies, wondering whether listing on a U.S. exchange is worth it, are looking around for a new league.
Chilling Effect on U.S. Listing
Last year, the DOJ announced its first criminal enforcement action against a foreign issuer for violating the FCPA. See Press Release #06-700, U.S. Resolves Probe Against Oil Company that Bribed Iranian Official (Oct. 13, 2006). No mere SEC sanction for books-and-records violations, this was a U.S. criminal prosecution for payments overseas, by a foreign company, in violation of FCPA ' 30. United States v. Statoil, ASA, 06 Cr. 960 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 13, 2006). 'Although Statoil is a foreign issuer,' said Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher in the DOJ press release, the FCPA 'applies to foreign and domestic public companies alike, where the company's stock trades on American exchanges.' The deferred prosecution included a $10.5 million penalty, further disgorgement of an additional $10.5 million, and compliance monitoring for three years, all in addition to a $3 million fine levied by Norway. Fisher warned that the DOJ is committed to enforce the FCPA vigorously 'against all international businesses whose conduct falls within its scope.'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.