Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In January 2006, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ('USPTO' or the 'Office') published a proposed rule revising patent practice with respect to continued examination filings, patent applications with patentably-indistinct claims, and examination of claims in patent applications. Following the submission of written comments and public meetings, the Office published its final rule on Aug. 21, 2007. 72 Fed. Reg. 46716 (Aug. 21, 2007) (to be codified at 37 C.F.R. pt. 1). The final rule differs in many respects from the originally proposed rule, and the final rule includes a number of significant changes to patent practice.
As discussed in detail in this two-part series, the final rule places a number of restrictions on various aspects of patent practice. This first installment examines the final rule as it relates to continued examination filings. The second installment, then, will examine the final rule as it relates to examination of claims, applications with patentably-indistinct claims, second-action final practice, and refund of excess-claim fees.
Although the portions of the final rule discussed in this two-part series are likely to have the most sweeping impact on patent practice before the USPTO, it is important to note that these are not the only changes to patent practice included in the final rule. In addition, there are nuances to many aspects of the final rule that are beyond the scope of this series and will not be discussed here. Rather, the purpose of this series is to provide the reader with a broad understanding of the changes being promulgated by the final rule, as well as considerations that may need to be taken into account from now until the final rule becomes effective on Nov. 1, 2007, and going forward beyond Nov. 1. It is also worth noting that although the second installment will publish after the effective date of the final rule, i.e., Nov. 1, 2007, the portions of the final rule most likely leading to considerations for applicants before the effective date are discussed in this first installment. That is, although some actions that applicants may consider taking in view of the portion of the final rule discussed in this first installment may result in appreciable benefit if taken before the effective date rather than after, this is less likely the case for the portion of the final rule discussed in the forthcoming second installment.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?