Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Part One of a Three-Part Series
Subleasing has become so common in commercial leasing today that space users, brokers, and attorneys need to be aware of the many issues that arise in these transactions. The Prime Landlord is faced with a new occupant in its building that it may or may not have contemplated. The Sublandlord needs to minimize the exposure that may come with new responsibilities of being a landlord. The Subtenant may find itself in the awkward position of looking to the Prime Landlord for the provision of services, without the comfort of privity of contract to enforce the Prime Landlord's obligations. Nonetheless, over the years, Prime Landlords, Sublandlords, and Subtenants have negotiated their way around these potential pitfalls. This three-part article provides a few pointers for the Prime Landlord, Sublandlord, and Subtenant to consider when negotiating provisions relating to subleasing.
Prime Landlord
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?