Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Landlord's Consent for a Sublease Unreasonably Withheld
Where a landlord withholds consent for a sublease, the landlord must demonstrate that the withholding was not unreasonable. Buck Consultants, Inc. v. Glenpointe Associates v. Mellon Financial Corporation, No. 05-4685, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Feb. 9, 2007.
The landlord leased space to PricewaterhouseCoopers, which as-signed the lease to Buck. Under the terms of the lease, Buck was not permitted to assign or sublease the space without the consent of the landlord, but the lease required that such consent may not be unreasonably withheld. Meanwhile, the landlord entered into a separate lease with another tenant, Eisai. After leasing its initial space, Eisai sought to lease more space from the landlord. However, when Eisai did not like the terms of the offer of the additional space, Eisai began to negotiate with Buck to sublease its space. Upon learning of the negotiations between Eisai and Buck, the landlord attempted to make additional proposals to Eisai, which were rejected by Eisai. Eisai and Buck eventually agreed on terms of a sublease. However, the landlord provided Buck with a written notice of its refusal to consent to the sublease.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?