Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Supreme Court's unanimous recent decision in United States v. Atlantic Research Corporation, 127 S.Ct. 2331, 551 U.S. ____ (2007), No. 06-562 (June 11, 2007) potentially affects every commercial real estate transaction in the United States, including those involving fixtures and leased equipment. This decision does so because the Court confirmed that a private party cleaning up contaminated land has an effective judicial remedy under federal law. Because of the breadth of the law under which it was decided ' the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ('CERCLA') or Superfund, 42 U.S.C. '9601, et seq. ' this decision affects not only owners and occupiers of land, but also the owners and users of leased equipment ' fixtures ' located on such land.
This month, we explain the Atlantic Research decision and some of the basic steps a party to a commercial real estate transaction should take to help protect itself from unexpected CERCLA claims resulting from this decision. In next month's issue, we will explain detailed steps tailored to help those in the equipment leasing field protect against such claims, which are now a larger risk for those leasing fixtures.
Overview
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?