Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Part one of this article explained the terminology and discussed some of the challenges employers face in treating transgender employees in a nondiscriminatory manner.
Implications for Employers
Likely influenced by the changing legal climate for transgender persons, some U.S. corporations have, in recent years, taken steps to provide a more inclusive environment for transgender employees. The HRC Foundation, which tracks the GLBT (Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, Transgender)-friendliness of employers, currently identifies 122 of the Fortune 500 as having non-discrimination policies that include gender identity, along with 137 smaller private sector companies. HRC Workplace Project Database, www.hrc.org/worklife/pdsearch (last visited Mar. 23, 2007). The fact that so many recognizable corporate names have deemed it in their best interests to implement policies to protect their transgender employees will likely influence other employers to consider whether they should follow suit.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?