Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The crisis in the subprime mortgage markets has brought to light many allegations of predatory practices by mortgage lenders and other participants in the housing industry. In Barkley v. Olympia Mortgage Co., NYLJ 8/28/07, p. 31, col. 3, Judge Raymond Dearie of the Eastern District approved a strategy that might permit some victims of the alleged fraud to obtain a federal forum, with the possibility of treble damages and attorneys fees: allege (and prove) that the predatory practices constituted a form of racial discrimination.
The Allegations
Plaintiffs in the Barkley case are all African-Americans who contacted United Homes about purchasing a first home. They allege that United Homes purchased defective homes at foreclosure sales, performed cosmetic repairs, and then resold the homes at highly inflated prices. The complaint alleges that United Homes worked with appraisers, who appraised the home at inflated prices, enabling lenders to obtain FHA insurance for loans that exceeded the value of the homes, and therefore to collect at inflated prices when borrowers defaulted. The complaint also alleges that United Homes offered the assistance of lawyers and lenders to speed through the purchase and mortgage process, giving the plaintiff-purchasers little opportunity to obtain independent advice. Perhaps concerned that they might be faced with a caveat emptor response to state law fraud claims, plaintiffs alleged that the various defendants ' United Homes, together with lenders, appraisers, and lawyers ' had targeted minorities as victims of the scam, and, in the process, had violated both federal civil rights statutes and the federal Fair Housing Act.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.