Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Equitable Relief from a Spouse's Tax Liability
When a taxpayer signs a joint return with his or her spouse, he or she will be jointly and severally liable to pay the tax shown on the return and any deficiency that may later be assessed on that return. I.R.C. ' 6013(d). Husband and wife typically sign joint returns as their aggregate income tax liability will, in most cases, be less on a joint return than it would be if each filed separately. Once a joint return has been signed by the taxpayer, however, he or she cannot avoid the liability for tax with respect to that return. This can lead to serious financial problems long after the year for which the return was signed. Errors with respect to the return will result in tax liability that may be directly asserted against the taxpayer who is not responsible for, and may not be aware of, those errors. A similar situation may occur when tax is shown to be due on the return (the tax is 'self-assessed') but is not paid. So-called 'innocent spouse' relief under ' 6015 may be available, but no one should assume that relief can be readily obtained. Recent developments make this very clear.
The current statute was enacted in 1998 to update and liberalize relief from joint several liability for a taxpayer whose spouse is responsible for omissions or erroneous deductions on the joint return. The effect of ' 6015 and its subsequent interpretation and amendment in 2000 (making clear that 'no refunds' are permitted) has previously been discussed in The Matrimonial Strategist. See Thomas R. White, 'Seeking Relief from the Improvidently Filed Joint Return: Recent Developments,' The Matrimonial Strategist, May 2001, and 'How Much Does a Spouse Have to Know to Be Liable for Her Husband's Tax?' The Matrimonial Strategist March 2002. Statutory relief from joint liability has been difficult to obtain, as much from the limited premise of the relief provisions as from the restrictive interpretation of these provisions by IRS regulations. Taxpayers who are sufficiently aware of potential tax problems arising from their spouses' activities have always been at a disadvantage in seeking relief from their inability to anticipate tax problems resulting from behavior of their spouses. This concern has been highlighted by recent judicial and legislative activity focused specifically on requests for equitable relief.
Relief Under ' 6015
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?