Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In June 2007, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) approved new business valuation standards effective for assignments accepted after Jan. 1, 2008 for all member accountants. The AICPA's Statement on Standards for Valuation Services No. 1 (SSVS 1), 'Valuation of a Business, Business Ownership Interest, Security, or Intangible Asset,' is a solid, well-reasoned set of principles on how to perform and report a valuation analysis. SSVS 1 complements other business valuation standards, such as the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and standards already in force by the American Society of Appraisers (ASA), Institute of Business Appraisers (IBA), and the National Association of Certified Valuation Analysts. (NACVA). These latter appraisal-oriented organizations have member numbers ranging from about 5,000 to 50,000, and include many accountants who regularly undertake valuation assignments for marital dissolution purposes.
The AICPA, however, with about 330,000 CPAs, is by far the largest organization with membership in every state. Previously, only AICPA members who were also members of one of the other organizations were required to adhere to the valuation standards of that other organization. The new AICPA standard will require all of its individual and firm members who are involved in business valuations to follow the newly issued standards. State Boards of Accountancy are likely to adopt the standards too, further obligating CPAs who may not be members of the AICPA.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.