Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
'Love means never having to say you're sorry,' according to Eric Segal's protagonist in the 1970s hit book and movie, Love Story. That may work in love but, increasingly, it may not apply to the more adversarial realm of medical malpractice and adverse patient outcomes.
Thirty years ago I began my claim-handling career by attending a five-week adjuster 'boot camp' in Atlanta run by a national third-party claim administrator. Wizened instructors drummed into the newly minted adjusters certain precepts as part of that indoctrination program. Conventional wisdom in handling medical malpractice claims ' as in handling any kind of liability claim ' was never to admit to fault or blame, even when there was fault or blame. A corollary was to make no premature offers of financial settlement, but to undertake painstaking investigation of a claim to assure oneself that it was meritorious and worthy of a settlement offer. Another tenet of claim handling was that you should never make any payment without getting a signed 'Release of All Claims' in exchange. In other words, you never give anything away; no signature on the release means no settlement payment.
A New Movement Afoot
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?