Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Law Firm Partnership & Benefits ReportLJN NewslettersNewsSections

PC Partners Face NY Tax Challenge: Will Other States Follow?

By Sheldon I. Banoff
November 29, 2007

Last year, we informed LFPBR readers of the rediscovery by some partners in multi-state partnerships of the benefits of becoming a professional corporation ('PC') partner in their law firms, primarily to obtain state income tax savings. See, Banoff, 'To PC or Not to PC: The Rise and Fall and Rise (Again) of Professional Corporation Partners in Law Firms,' LFPBR, Vol. 12, No. 9 (Oct. 2006), p. 1. We observed that some firms have accommodated (and in some cases encouraged) some of their partners to consider the incorporation alternative. As discussed below, New York recently enacted legislation that would potentially adversely affect that strategy, including those who incorporated long before the legislation was passed, and it is unclear whether other states may follow.

Anecdotal evidence indicates a rebirth in recent years in the use of PCs for partners of profitable multi-state law partnerships, to provide aggregate (multi-state) income tax savings for some or many of the firms' highly paid partners. The PC structure is particularly useful for highly profitable law firm partnerships, limited liability partnerships ('LLPs'), and limited liability companies ('LLCs') ' taxable as partnerships that have a substantial amount of their income attributable to offices in states having high income tax rates applicable to individual partners.

This premium content is locked for Law Firm Partnership & Benefits Report subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.