Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Tenant Cannot Assert Material Breach Without Notice to Landlord
A tenant's failure to pay rent may not be excused where the tenant alleged that the landlord committed a material breach and where the tenant failed to provide sufficient notice to the landlord. Kinstler v. RTB South Greely, Ltd., 160 P.2d 1125 (Wyoming S.Ct., June 19, 2007).
The landlord and tenant entered into a lease for office space. The tenant was required to pay $1,000 per month for rent plus operating expenses. The lease incorporated a Landlord Work Letter that provided that the landlord was to landscape the area next to the east windows of the north office. The lease further provided that in the event of any alleged default by the landlord, the tenant must give notice of the alleged default to the landlord in writing and afford the landlord a reasonable opportunity to cure the default. Thereafter, the landlord failed to provide the required landscaping, and the tenant discontinued his payment of rent without providing written notice to the landlord of the default. Subsequently, the landlord evicted the tenant from the premises and commenced an action against the tenant seeking to recover the unpaid rent. The tenant affirmatively asserted, inter alia, that the failure to provide the landscaping was a material breach that excused him from paying rent.
The district court disagreed and held that the tenant had not complied with the terms of the notice requirement of the lease and, therefore, the tenant was not entitled to rely upon the default as a material breach that would excuse the payment of rent. The appellate court affirmed, upholding the district court's analysis.
Tenant Cannot Assert Material Breach Without Notice to Landlord
A tenant's failure to pay rent may not be excused where the tenant alleged that the landlord committed a material breach and where the tenant failed to provide sufficient notice to the landlord.
The landlord and tenant entered into a lease for office space. The tenant was required to pay $1,000 per month for rent plus operating expenses. The lease incorporated a Landlord Work Letter that provided that the landlord was to landscape the area next to the east windows of the north office. The lease further provided that in the event of any alleged default by the landlord, the tenant must give notice of the alleged default to the landlord in writing and afford the landlord a reasonable opportunity to cure the default. Thereafter, the landlord failed to provide the required landscaping, and the tenant discontinued his payment of rent without providing written notice to the landlord of the default. Subsequently, the landlord evicted the tenant from the premises and commenced an action against the tenant seeking to recover the unpaid rent. The tenant affirmatively asserted, inter alia, that the failure to provide the landscaping was a material breach that excused him from paying rent.
The district court disagreed and held that the tenant had not complied with the terms of the notice requirement of the lease and, therefore, the tenant was not entitled to rely upon the default as a material breach that would excuse the payment of rent. The appellate court affirmed, upholding the district court's analysis.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.