Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
But others ' again, armchair critics, and technowhizzes and recognized online experts alike ' see the Internet as a set of mutually agreeable protocols, and suppose that e-commerce participants apply trade law akin to their medieval trade-fair predecessors (for more on this theme, see, Bick's article in the October edition of e-Commerce Law & Strategy, 'e-Commerce Communities Employ Medieval Justice: Internet Sellers Use Extrajudicial Remedies Similar to Merchant Law'). The observers in this camp highlight the fact that participation in peer-to-peer networks remains very high despite the efforts of copyright owners to shut these forums down, and the fact that anonymous e-mail is regularly used to make false marketing claims.
Despite the Internet's global reach, it is the propensity of American citizens and U.S. residents to engage in e-commerce ' and of American courts and governmental agencies to accept, resolve and publish the decisions in those cases ' that makes it fair to say that American law dominates e-commerce.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.