Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Entertainment Law & FinanceKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawLitigationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Band Name Dispute Over Recording and Concert Uses

By John Pacenti
December 21, 2007
The Miami girl group Expos' ruled the charts in the 1980s, turning out a multiplatinum album and numerous hits, including the No. 1 single, 'Seasons Change.' But some things never change. Turmoil with management roiled the group during its hey-day, and rancor has returned now that the trio is on a popular reunion tour, riding high on 1980s dance nostalgia. The singers have been sued to stop using the name Expos' after breaking with promoters in August, just months before the music group's trademark licensing agreement was set to expire.

Crystal Entertainment & Filmworks of Miami recently filed a lawsuit against the group in U.S. District Court in Fort Lauderdale, alleging it owns the rights to the group's name. The music group's founder ' prominent Miami Beach songwriter and producer Lewis A. Martinee ' also filed recent applications for the trademark for both the recorded music and the performances.

Jeanette Jurado, Ann Curless Weiss and Gioia Bruno of Expos' assert that Crystal ' which inherited the ownership rights to Expos's recorded music ' does not have the right to the trademark as it pertains to live performances. Among its allegations, Crystal's lawsuit alleges trademark infringement, breach of contract and unfair competition. It also alleges 'cybersquatting' for the group using the Expos' name on its Web site. Crystal named former band member Kelly Moneymaker in the lawsuit, as well as the group's booking agent, Paradise Artists of Los Angeles, and its Las Vegas-based merchandise vendor, Walking Distance Entertainment.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

Discovery of Claim Construction and Infringement Analysis May be Compelled Prior to a Markman Hearing Image

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.