Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bit Parts

By Stan Soocher
December 21, 2007

Copyright/Joint-Authorship Test

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia ruled that evidence supported a jury finding that movie producer Maura Flynn was co-author of the documentary, 'Your Mother Kills Animals' (YMKA). Berman v. Johnson, 1:07cv39. The jury decided that Flynn and director Curt Johnson intended to be joint authors of the documentary, and that Flynn made independently copyrightable contributions. After a dispute arose over the angle of the movie's content, Johnson had stopped communicating with Flynn and began marketing the documentary on his own. Flynn's attorney, Michael D. Steger of New York, noted that the 'trial testimony revealed that Johnson and Flynn agreed to co-produce the film, to exercise joint control over its making and to divide profits evenly, but they never put their agreement in writing.' He also said that the district court's ruling 'appears to be a case of first impression in the Eastern District of Virginia.' In its decision, the district court rejected a Ninth Circuit joint-authorship test that requires a joint author to show control over creation of the work. See, Aalmuhammed v. Lee, 202 F.3d 1227 (9th Cir. 2000). Instead, adopting the approach of the Second and Seventh Circuits,
the district court emphasized: 'the Ninth Circuit's rule is susceptible to inequitable manipulation. ' The record reflects that Flynn was contractually entitled to exercise control over YMKA and was only prevented from doing so by Johnson's wrongful conduct. It follows that to apply the Ninth Circuit's rule on these facts would violate the sensibly settled maxim that 'no one should profit by his own conscious wrong.”


DMCA Safe-Harbor Bid/Declaratory Suit

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.