Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Your hospital and physicians have the opportunity to conduct a study on a new method for the early detection of a disease. They go through the necessary procedures of obtaining patients at risk for the disease, and those patients knowingly agree to participate in the program. However, there may be one problem with this scenario. According to a recent case out of New York, your hospital and physicians may have just established a hospital-patient and/or physician-patient relationship with each of the study participants, exposing all of them to the risk of multiple medical malpractice lawsuits.
New York Case Causes Concern
This most recent case on the issue of hospital and physician liability for test-subject injury is Sosnoff v. Jackman, 845 NYS2d 391 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., 11/07/07). In Sosnoff, the plaintiff had a family history of ovarian cancer. In May 1996, she enrolled in a research study conducted at White Plains Hospital Center concerning early detection of ovarian cancer in patients with a family history of such cancer. As part of the research study protocol, Ms. Sosnoff reported to the hospital approximately every six months for five years for physical examinations performed by the doctors and for diagnostic tests, including ultrasounds and sonograms. Toward the end of the study, in February 2001, Ms. Sosnoff was diagnosed with Stage 3C uterine or endometrial cancer with involvement of the ovaries and lymph system. Ms. Sosnoff filed suit alleging that the hospital and two physicians who participated in conducting the study had negligently failed to diagnose her cancer in its earlier stages.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.