Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Lack of Logo Placement At Center of Ruling Over Meat Loaf Album Packaging
Plaintiff Stephen Popovich's company had signed a production deal with CBS Records in 1977. CBS promised to include the logo of Popovich's 'Cleveland International Records' 'with respect to records comprised exclusively of an Artists' performances' distributed in the United States, Canada and seven other countries, 'provided however, that the size of such Mark and the particular area on such label or jacket or advertisement onto which CBS places such Mark shall be determined solely by CBS.' But 'no failure on the part of CBS to comply with its [logo] obligations pursuant to this paragraph 7.05 will constitute a material breach of this agreement,' the production contract stated. Instead, if the logo wasn't included, Popovich's relief was limited to CBS 'rectify[ing] the error in all such materials prepared after its written receipt of written notice thereof from [Popovich].' Popovich and CBS Records renewed this agreement several times.
In 1977, CBS's Epic Records released 'Bat Out of Hell,' the debut album by Cleveland International artist Meat Loaf that has sold over 30 million copies. CBS subsequently released three more Meat Loaf recordings, including a greatest-hits package. Popovich's company sued Sony Music in 1995, alleging underpayment of royalties. In 1998, the parties entered into a settlement agreement that included the following clause:
'Sony Music will continue to place the Cleveland logo (in the design currently used on the tape configuration of 'Bat Out of Hell') on albums, CDs, cassettes, and all other forms and configurations of master recordings embodied on the [Meat Loaf] albums entitled 'Bat Out of Hell,' 'Dead Ringer,' 'Midnight at the Lost and Found,' 'Hits Out of Hell' and will add such logo to all forms and configurations on which it does not presently appear (including CDs) manufactured by Sony Music after September 1, 1998, provided, however, that Sony Music shall reasonably determine the size and location of such logo.'
Popovich and Sony Music otherwise ratified the original terms of the 1977 agreement. Then in 2002, Popovich sued again, later claiming in court documents that 'Sony omitted the Cleveland Logo on more than 10 million CDs between September 1, 1998 and March 8, 2005 (the date its last discovery responses were certified). This included 32 separate releases of Bat Out of Hell, 22 releases of Dead Ringer, Midnight at the Lost and Found, Hits Out of Hell and other Meatloaf albums, and literally hundreds of other compilation albums (that themselves sold millions of copies).' Popovich also insisted the 1998 logo clause included Internet download-purchase sites.
Sony Music countered: 'The 1977 Agreement explicitly and unequivocally provides that breach of the logo obligation provision will not constitute a material breach, and that Popovich will have no right to damages for breach of this provision. ' Such limitation of remedies clauses are customary in music industry contracts because recordings are typically manufactured by multiple third parties who are difficult to police, and because such logo placement has little practical value in the marketplace, given that consumers purchase records based on the artists they enjoy and not because of a music company's logo.'
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.