The Pregnant Employee in the Hazardous Workplace

Case Law

First, it is well settled that the company may not transfer the employee against her wishes to another job or force her to take a leave of absence. This rule was stated clearly by the Supreme Court in International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 499 U.S. 187, 206 (1991). Johnson Controls had implemented a policy, after eight employees became pregnant, barring female workers of child-bearing age from working in a job that involved exposure to lead. The Court found that decisions about 'the welfare of future children must be left to the parents who conceive, bear, support and raise them rather than to the employers who hire those parents.' The company argued that the Court should 'allow fetal-protection policies that mandate particular standards for pregnant or fertile women.' The Court held that '[w]e decline to do so' and that 'women as capable of doing their jobs as their male counterparts may not be forced to choose between having a child and having a job.' Finally, the Court stated that under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, the 'decision to become pregnant or to work while being either pregnant or capable of becoming pregnant was reserved for each individual women to make for herself.'