Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

KickerFeaturesTopicsTechnology Media and TelecomSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Getting Smart About Analyzing Electronically Stored Information

By Eric Rosenberg
January 28, 2008
Not long ago, the pain of analyzing electronically stored information (ESI) for legal e-discovery, regulatory inquiries, and corporate investigations was hardly a blip on the radar screen. The requests were far and few between and, significantly more time was spent chasing down memos tucked away in filing cabinets than worrying about a handful of innocuous electronic documents. e-Discovery was in its infancy, and the costly and labor intensive process of sifting through and analyzing documents simply wasn't worth re-thinking given the low volume of cases and data that needed to be reviewed.

Fast forward to 2007, where e-discovery and its concomitant analysis has become a major component of any discovery request. According to an online article from Law.com, more than 90% of new business records are created electronically, and 40% of them are never converted to paper. In fact, in its End-User Survey & Market Forecast 2006-2010, research firm Enterprise Strategy Group (ESG) found that 42% of respondents state that their organization has been involved in a legal proceeding or regulatory inquiry that necessitated the search for and retrieval of electronic records. e-Mail, in particular, has become a key issue as it's used in nearly every business transaction: negotiating contract terms, settling disputes, acknowledging agreements and finalizing documents.

Further, the problem is only getting worse. Consider the newly amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), which went into effect last December. Rules 16 and 26 were amended to provide the court with early notice of e-discovery issues. A clear implication of this rule change is that the number of cases and the amount of data subject to analysis and review has increased significantly. According to a 2006 survey by international law firm Fullbright and Jaworski, large U.S. companies are already concurrently managing 556 cases on average, with an average of 50 new disputes emerging each year.

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The Bankruptcy Hotline Image

Recent cases of importance to your practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

How AI Has Affected PR Image

When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.