Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Key Employee Retention under BAPCPA

By Douglas P. Bartner and Lynette C. Kelly
January 29, 2008

In 2005, Congress purported to address the hot-button issue of executive compensation in bankruptcy by severely limiting Key Employee Retention Programs ('KERPs') that were then common in reorganization cases. These limitations on KERPs were set forth in Bankruptcy Code ' 503(c), added by the Bankruptcy Abuse and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (the 'Act'). Although billed as a response to recent abuses of the bankruptcy system by executives of corporate giants like Enron Corporation, the amendment as drafted applied absent any Enron-type fraud or mismanagement, prompting concern that it would impede successful reorganizations by preventing necessary retention payments to debtors' executives. As post-Act case law shows, the Act in practice has not had the dramatic effect on executive compensation in bankruptcy that was perhaps intended. This is good news, however, for companies facing reorganization, which need to provide appropriate compensation to their employees in order to negotiate the difficult terrain of Chapter 11 and emerge successfully.

Background: Pre-Act Use of KERPs

Prior to the Act, KERPs were used routinely by debtors in Chapter 11 cases in an effort to retain key employees, principally senior management, who might otherwise seek employment at another, more financially stable, company. Underlying the widespread use of KERPs was the premise that the retention of knowledgeable and experienced personnel, particularly at senior levels, is often critical to enabling a troubled company to reorganize successfully, ultimately maximizing value to creditors. Although compensation packages varied from case to case depending on the debtor's needs, typical components of a KERP included: performance-based incentive bonuses; retention bonuses; success bonuses upon meeting bankruptcy benchmarks; discretionary bonuses for rank and file employees; severance benefits; and assumption of existing employment or severance agreements. Because no Bankruptcy Code provision specifically addressed KERPs, bankruptcy courts considered whether to approve a KERP against the standards for non-ordinary course use of property of the estate under ” 105(a), 363(b) and 365(a) of the Bankruptcy Code: whether the program was fair and reasonable and within the debtor's sound business judgment. This standard afforded a debtor substantial flexibility in formulating a KERP.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Yachts, Jets, Horses & Hooch: Specialized Commercial Leasing Models Image

Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.

Hyperlinked Documents: The Latest e-Discovery Challenge Image

As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.

Identifying Your Practice's Differentiator Image

How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.

Risks and Ad Fraud Protection In Digital Advertising Image

The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.

Turning Business Development Plans Into Reality Image

This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.