Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

New NJ Law Allows Pulling Plug on Sex Offenders' Access to Internet

By Michael Booth
January 29, 2008

Legislation signed last month will allow New Jersey judges to restrict Internet access for convicted sex offenders and make it easier for law enforcement to monitor their online activity.

The law, S-1979, would limit Internet access for certain sex offenders who are subject to Megan's Law registration or community supervision for life or who are on probation or parole. (S-1979 is available online at http://pdf server.amlaw.com/nj/S-1979.pdf.)

The law, which takes effect in 60 days, allows a sentencing court, in addition to other conditions, to impose any or all of these restrictions:

1. Prohibit the offender from accessing or using a computer or any other device with Internet capability without the prior written approval of the court, except for use, with the permission of a parole or probation officer, in connection with employment or to look for a job.

2. Require the offender to submit to periodic unannounced examinations of his or her computer or other Internet device by a probation officer, law enforcement officer or assigned computer or information technology specialist.

3.Require the offender to submit to the installation on his or her computer or other Internet device, at his or her expense, one or more hardware or software systems to monitor their Internet use.

4. Require the offender to submit to any other appropriate restrictions concerning his or her use or access of a computer or any other Internet device.

All four conditions would be mandatory if the trier of fact finds that a computer or any other device with Internet capability was used to facilitate the commission of the underlying crime.

A covered sex offender who fails
to comply with the Internet access conditions imposed commits a fourth-degree crime. It is also a fourth-degree crime for a Megan's Law registrant to fail to apprise the appropriate law enforcement agency about his or her access to the Internet.

The law directs the state attorney general to approve training programs for those charged with its enforcement, including instruction in conducting investigations in which computers, telecommunications devices and other high technology instruments are utilized in the commission of sex offenses.

Sen. Richard Codey (D-Essex) the chief sponsor, signed the law as
acting governor (Gov. Jon Corzine being out of the country at the time).

Codey and the Assembly sponsor, Linda Greenstein (D-Middlesex), introduced the measure after The New York Times reported in May that some 7,000 convicted sex offenders had registered accounts at the social networking site MySpace.com. The law passed both houses of the Legislature without opposition.

Florida and Nevada are the
only other states to have enacted similar restrictions.

Michael Booth writes for the New Jersey Law Journal, an ALM affiliate of Internet Law & Strategy.

Legislation signed last month will allow New Jersey judges to restrict Internet access for convicted sex offenders and make it easier for law enforcement to monitor their online activity.

The law, S-1979, would limit Internet access for certain sex offenders who are subject to Megan's Law registration or community supervision for life or who are on probation or parole. (S-1979 is available online at http://pdf server.amlaw.com/nj/S-1979.pdf.)

The law, which takes effect in 60 days, allows a sentencing court, in addition to other conditions, to impose any or all of these restrictions:

1. Prohibit the offender from accessing or using a computer or any other device with Internet capability without the prior written approval of the court, except for use, with the permission of a parole or probation officer, in connection with employment or to look for a job.

2. Require the offender to submit to periodic unannounced examinations of his or her computer or other Internet device by a probation officer, law enforcement officer or assigned computer or information technology specialist.

3.Require the offender to submit to the installation on his or her computer or other Internet device, at his or her expense, one or more hardware or software systems to monitor their Internet use.

4. Require the offender to submit to any other appropriate restrictions concerning his or her use or access of a computer or any other Internet device.

All four conditions would be mandatory if the trier of fact finds that a computer or any other device with Internet capability was used to facilitate the commission of the underlying crime.

A covered sex offender who fails
to comply with the Internet access conditions imposed commits a fourth-degree crime. It is also a fourth-degree crime for a Megan's Law registrant to fail to apprise the appropriate law enforcement agency about his or her access to the Internet.

The law directs the state attorney general to approve training programs for those charged with its enforcement, including instruction in conducting investigations in which computers, telecommunications devices and other high technology instruments are utilized in the commission of sex offenses.

Sen. Richard Codey (D-Essex) the chief sponsor, signed the law as
acting governor (Gov. Jon Corzine being out of the country at the time).

Codey and the Assembly sponsor, Linda Greenstein (D-Middlesex), introduced the measure after The New York Times reported in May that some 7,000 convicted sex offenders had registered accounts at the social networking site MySpace.com. The law passed both houses of the Legislature without opposition.

Florida and Nevada are the
only other states to have enacted similar restrictions.

Michael Booth writes for the New Jersey Law Journal, an ALM affiliate of Internet Law & Strategy.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

Generative AI and the 2024 Elections: Risks, Realities, and Lessons for Businesses Image

GenAI's ability to produce highly sophisticated and convincing content at a fraction of the previous cost has raised fears that it could amplify misinformation. The dissemination of fake audio, images and text could reshape how voters perceive candidates and parties. Businesses, too, face challenges in managing their reputations and navigating this new terrain of manipulated content.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.