Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A Taxing Topic
Not surprisingly, the law on Internet taxation remains unsettled ' just as it has been every time we have written about it. In late 2007, Congress once again (as it has done several times) put off a decision on making the Internet Tax Freedom Act permanent. That law prevents state and local governments from taxing Internet access services (in the same way they add charges to your phone bills ' see, www.informationweek.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=202801131).
After unanimous approval in Congress, the President quickly signed The Internet Tax Freedom Amendments Act of 2007 on Oct. 31. While the ban did not become permanent, as backers had hoped, this time it was extended for seven years, until 2014 (much longer than the brief extensions passed in 2001 and 2004). (The extension also clarified how related services may be taxed, and began a phase-out of certain provisions that allowed 'grandfathered' pre-existing taxes to survive.) The importance of this extension to consumers and businesses, in an economy that has come to depend on Internet access, can be seen in the efforts abroad to tax online services, as has occurred in France, for example (see, www.dailytech.com/French+President+Proposes+Internet+Tax/article10306.htm). The Internet is such an inviting target to revenue-strapped local taxing authorities ' especially since taxpayers may not be local voters ' that federal protection clearly remains a necessity.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?