Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Attorneys' Fees in Bad Faith Bankruptcy Claim
Where a bankruptcy claim is filed in bad faith to avoid attorneys' fees in a matrimonial action, the claim may be dismissed. In Re Lombardo, Case No. 806-73127-478, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York, June 29, 2007.
The debtor filed for Chapter 7 relief, listing eight creditors on her schedules. Seven of the creditors were credit card companies with a total debt of $8,409.63. The eighth creditor was the debtor's matrimonial attorney, whose claim was in the sum of $56,749.95 for legal fees associated with the debtor's litigious divorce. After a hearing, the bankruptcy court dismissed the debtor's claim, citing bad faith. It held that under 11 U.S.C. ' 707(a), although 'bad faith' is not an enumerated cause for dismissal, the Second Circuit has followed a course of dismissal where there is an absence of good faith after consideration of the totality of the circumstances, including: the debtor's manipulations, the absence of an attempt to pay creditors, the debtor's failure to make lifestyle changes, the resources of the debtor, and the inflation of expenses by the debtor. In this case, the court also considered that the creditor, as the debtor's matrimonial attorney, could have removed herself from the litigation when the debtor was unable to pay her attorneys' fees. The attorney-creditor, however, continued to stay on the case because the debtor claimed she did not have funds to retain another attorney.
Attorneys' Fees in Bad Faith Bankruptcy Claim
Where a bankruptcy claim is filed in bad faith to avoid attorneys' fees in a matrimonial action, the claim may be dismissed. In Re Lombardo, Case No. 806-73127-478, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
The debtor filed for Chapter 7 relief, listing eight creditors on her schedules. Seven of the creditors were credit card companies with a total debt of $8,409.63. The eighth creditor was the debtor's matrimonial attorney, whose claim was in the sum of $56,749.95 for legal fees associated with the debtor's litigious divorce. After a hearing, the bankruptcy court dismissed the debtor's claim, citing bad faith. It held that under 11 U.S.C. ' 707(a), although 'bad faith' is not an enumerated cause for dismissal, the Second Circuit has followed a course of dismissal where there is an absence of good faith after consideration of the totality of the circumstances, including: the debtor's manipulations, the absence of an attempt to pay creditors, the debtor's failure to make lifestyle changes, the resources of the debtor, and the inflation of expenses by the debtor. In this case, the court also considered that the creditor, as the debtor's matrimonial attorney, could have removed herself from the litigation when the debtor was unable to pay her attorneys' fees. The attorney-creditor, however, continued to stay on the case because the debtor claimed she did not have funds to retain another attorney.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.