Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When a business needs to raise money it may consider hiring a 'finder,' which is normally a consultant who helps the company find investors in the business. The company should proceed with caution in retaining a finder due to the regulated nature of its business, and there are several 'market' terms in a written Finder's Fee Agreement that the company should insist upon.
Generally, a 'finder' or 'placement agent' receives a 'finder's fee' depending upon the amount of capital it introduces to the company. The Securities and Exchange Commission ('SEC') has long regulated this practice and, depending upon a facts and circumstances test (known as the 'Issuer Exemption'), requires finders to be registered as broker-dealers under '15(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The factors the SEC considers for a finder to fall under the Issuer Exemption include:
The rationale for exempting finders from registration is that the finder is not a broker because he or she is not 'effecting' transactions for others. That is, the finder's activities are limited to identifying potential investors and introducing them to the company. The negotiation of the investment terms, the theory goes, is strictly between the company and the investor.
More likely than not, however, the 'finder' answers at least some of the foregoing questions in a manner requiring registration as a broker-dealer. What does this mean to the issuing company that hires an unregistered finder? It could mean that its exemption from registration of the offering is blown, and the company is in violation of federal and state securities laws. It could also mean that the company is not allowed to accept the investments by the investors identified by the unregistered broker. In any case, it could mean that state and federal securities regulatory agencies are investigating the business and affairs of the company, which could be quite uncomfortable for even the cleanest of businesses.
Accordingly, I recommend that a carefully drafted Finder's Fee Agreement be negotiated with the finder prior to the commencement of any services on behalf of the company. The typical Finder's Fee Agreement includes provisions related to the services to be rendered on behalf of the company and the compensation due to the finder. I recommend the following additional provisions that will protect the issuing company:
Services to Be Performed
Clearly establish that the finder's obligations are to introduce the company to prospective investors by setting up face-to-face meetings. The finder has no authority to participate in any negotiations or discussions regarding the terms of the investment or to bind the company in any way. Ultimately, it is important for the company to retain, in its absolute discretion, the right to accept or reject any investor, and to decline to accept an investment from any prospective investor, identified by the finder.
Compensation
Ideally, the finder's fee would not be linked to the amount of capital raised by virtue of the finder's introductions. Since the Issuer Exemption test is of all of the relevant facts and circumstances, a 3% to 5% success fee, plus the finder's reasonable expenses, will probably not, in itself, require broker registration. It should be stated in the agreement that the finder's fee will not be deemed to be a brokerage fee or commission and will be compensation only for the act of introducing the company to prospective investors.
It is important to recognize that, in most cases, the finder's compensation will be tied to the amount of funding he or she secures for the company. The finder's interests are, therefore, different from the company's. The finder could put real pressure on the company to accept terms of an investment that are not favorable to the company with the hopes that the finder receives its compensation at any price despite the ill-effects on the company.
Investors
If there are funding sources that the company has already identified, they should be explicitly excluded from the potential investors so that the finder cannot lay claim to having introduced the company to them. Also, only 'accredited investors' should be considered as prospective investors.
Restrictive Covenants
'Confidentiality' and 'Non-Solicitation' provisions are key to protect the business secrets of the company, including its trade secrets and its employees and subcontractors. After all, the finder may be given valuable access to the company's business and personnel, which the company wants to protect from its competitors.
Representations, Warranties, and Covenants
The finder should represent and warrant to the company that: a) it has no conflicts of interests in the performance of the services under the agreement, b) it has and will maintain all of the required permits or licenses to perform the services (remember the broker-dealer registration discussion above), c) it has not been the subject of any investigation or proceeding brought by any state or federal agency having jurisdiction over the purchase or sale of securities, and d) in the case of an 'entity finder' (as opposed to an individual finder), a certain identified person within the entity will be responsible for the proper performance of the services. The finder should be prepared to indemnify the Company for breaches of these representations and other obligations.
Term and Termination
The agreement should be terminable within a reasonable time, and immediately in the event of a material breach by either party. The finder will want a 'tail' on investments that the company receives based on introductions it made prior to termination of the agreement. Typically, six to 12 months is customary.
Boilerplate
Although provisions such as anti-assignment, survival, integration, and choice of law/venue may seem unimportant, these are critical to protecting the business. That is, you want to make sure: a) the finder you hire will perform the services, not a substitute (anti-assignment), b) the representations, warranties, obligations, and restrictive covenants survive termination of the agreement so that if you later discover a breach, you still have recourse (survival), c) that there are no other 'side agreements' (integration), and d) that you can sue the finder (or be sued) on your home turf, not theirs (venue; choice of law).
Conclusion
Finders can provide valuable services on behalf of a company seeking funding since they may have access to investors that would not otherwise be known to the company. The terms of their involvement on behalf of the company are critical. Since a lot of investment capital is at stake, the company should take the time to make sure the investments are done properly and not place the company in undue jeopardy.
Adam J. August is an attorney in the McLean, VA office of Holland & Knight LLP (www.hklaw.com). He practices law in the areas of securities and financing transactions, mergers and acquisitions, and other business transactions. He can be reached at [email protected] or 703-720-8059.
When a business needs to raise money it may consider hiring a 'finder,' which is normally a consultant who helps the company find investors in the business. The company should proceed with caution in retaining a finder due to the regulated nature of its business, and there are several 'market' terms in a written Finder's Fee Agreement that the company should insist upon.
Generally, a 'finder' or 'placement agent' receives a 'finder's fee' depending upon the amount of capital it introduces to the company. The Securities and Exchange Commission ('SEC') has long regulated this practice and, depending upon a facts and circumstances test (known as the 'Issuer Exemption'), requires finders to be registered as broker-dealers under '15(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The factors the SEC considers for a finder to fall under the Issuer Exemption include:
The rationale for exempting finders from registration is that the finder is not a broker because he or she is not 'effecting' transactions for others. That is, the finder's activities are limited to identifying potential investors and introducing them to the company. The negotiation of the investment terms, the theory goes, is strictly between the company and the investor.
More likely than not, however, the 'finder' answers at least some of the foregoing questions in a manner requiring registration as a broker-dealer. What does this mean to the issuing company that hires an unregistered finder? It could mean that its exemption from registration of the offering is blown, and the company is in violation of federal and state securities laws. It could also mean that the company is not allowed to accept the investments by the investors identified by the unregistered broker. In any case, it could mean that state and federal securities regulatory agencies are investigating the business and affairs of the company, which could be quite uncomfortable for even the cleanest of businesses.
Accordingly, I recommend that a carefully drafted Finder's Fee Agreement be negotiated with the finder prior to the commencement of any services on behalf of the company. The typical Finder's Fee Agreement includes provisions related to the services to be rendered on behalf of the company and the compensation due to the finder. I recommend the following additional provisions that will protect the issuing company:
Services to Be Performed
Clearly establish that the finder's obligations are to introduce the company to prospective investors by setting up face-to-face meetings. The finder has no authority to participate in any negotiations or discussions regarding the terms of the investment or to bind the company in any way. Ultimately, it is important for the company to retain, in its absolute discretion, the right to accept or reject any investor, and to decline to accept an investment from any prospective investor, identified by the finder.
Compensation
Ideally, the finder's fee would not be linked to the amount of capital raised by virtue of the finder's introductions. Since the Issuer Exemption test is of all of the relevant facts and circumstances, a 3% to 5% success fee, plus the finder's reasonable expenses, will probably not, in itself, require broker registration. It should be stated in the agreement that the finder's fee will not be deemed to be a brokerage fee or commission and will be compensation only for the act of introducing the company to prospective investors.
It is important to recognize that, in most cases, the finder's compensation will be tied to the amount of funding he or she secures for the company. The finder's interests are, therefore, different from the company's. The finder could put real pressure on the company to accept terms of an investment that are not favorable to the company with the hopes that the finder receives its compensation at any price despite the ill-effects on the company.
Investors
If there are funding sources that the company has already identified, they should be explicitly excluded from the potential investors so that the finder cannot lay claim to having introduced the company to them. Also, only 'accredited investors' should be considered as prospective investors.
Restrictive Covenants
'Confidentiality' and 'Non-Solicitation' provisions are key to protect the business secrets of the company, including its trade secrets and its employees and subcontractors. After all, the finder may be given valuable access to the company's business and personnel, which the company wants to protect from its competitors.
Representations, Warranties, and Covenants
The finder should represent and warrant to the company that: a) it has no conflicts of interests in the performance of the services under the agreement, b) it has and will maintain all of the required permits or licenses to perform the services (remember the broker-dealer registration discussion above), c) it has not been the subject of any investigation or proceeding brought by any state or federal agency having jurisdiction over the purchase or sale of securities, and d) in the case of an 'entity finder' (as opposed to an individual finder), a certain identified person within the entity will be responsible for the proper performance of the services. The finder should be prepared to indemnify the Company for breaches of these representations and other obligations.
Term and Termination
The agreement should be terminable within a reasonable time, and immediately in the event of a material breach by either party. The finder will want a 'tail' on investments that the company receives based on introductions it made prior to termination of the agreement. Typically, six to 12 months is customary.
Boilerplate
Although provisions such as anti-assignment, survival, integration, and choice of law/venue may seem unimportant, these are critical to protecting the business. That is, you want to make sure: a) the finder you hire will perform the services, not a substitute (anti-assignment), b) the representations, warranties, obligations, and restrictive covenants survive termination of the agreement so that if you later discover a breach, you still have recourse (survival), c) that there are no other 'side agreements' (integration), and d) that you can sue the finder (or be sued) on your home turf, not theirs (venue; choice of law).
Conclusion
Finders can provide valuable services on behalf of a company seeking funding since they may have access to investors that would not otherwise be known to the company. The terms of their involvement on behalf of the company are critical. Since a lot of investment capital is at stake, the company should take the time to make sure the investments are done properly and not place the company in undue jeopardy.
Adam J. August is an attorney in the McLean, VA office of
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.