Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
At first blush, the recent decision, In re Northwest Airlines Corp., 483 F.3d 160 (2d Cir. 2007), in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that a federal court may enjoin a strike by employees covered under the Railway Labor Act (the 'RLA') following rejection of their collective bargaining agreement ('CBA'), would appear to be of limited applicability outside of airline bankruptcies. But the Second Circuit's underlying rationale ' that rejection of a CBA under Section 1113 'abrogates' the contract, 'effectively shielding [the debtor] from a charge of breach' ' has broader application to the rights of all employees, even those working in industries not covered by the RLA. Id. at 174. Courts adopting this rationale will likely conclude that rejecting a CBA under Section 1113 does not give rise to employee claims for rejection damages against the debtor.
Indeed, within 15 days of the Second Circuit's ruling, the bankruptcy court presiding over Northwest Airlines' Chapter 11 case concluded that it had no choice but to disallow the proof of claim filed by the flight attendants' union on behalf of approximately 7500 flight attendants, holding that if the CBA had not been breached when it was rejected, then the flight attendants could not have any claims. In re Northwest Airlines Corp., 366 B.R. 270, 274-75 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2007). The bankruptcy court left open the possibility that if the flight attendants union ratified a new agreement with the debtor that provided for a claim, the court might reconsider and allow a claim for the flight attendants. Id. at 277.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.