Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Copyright Infringement/Rule 12(b)(6) Motion
Though rarely granted by courts in copyright-infringement cases, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California approved a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss a copyright-infringement claim alleging that the syndicated talk show 'Rachael Ray' was substantially similar to a treatment and brief script titled 'Showbiz Chefs' that the plaintiffs submitted to the Food Network. Zella v. The E.W. Scripps Co., CV 06-7055 ABC(JTLX). The district court considered only the complaint itself and DVDs of 'Rachael Ray' episodes. The court also took judicial notice that hosts, celebrity guests, interviews and cooking segments are common TV-show elements. Then applying the extrinsic test, which examines concrete 'articulable similarities,' the court determined that the works in dispute were dissimilar in characters, dialogue, moods, pace, plots, sequences, settings and themes. The court noted that the plaintiffs 'have attached to their Complaint the one-page synopsis and three-page script for Showbiz Chefs, so the Court may consider it on a motion to dismiss. The Court may also consider the Rachael Ray show, as its content comprises the basis for Plaintiffs' claim and the CBS Defendants have, provided copies of episodes. The Court holds that no reasonable jury could conclude that Rachael Ray is substantially similar to any protectable elements of Showbiz Chefs or to the order in which Plaintiffs have presented non-protectable elements in Showbiz Chefs.'
Record Labels and Their Lawyers/Malicious Prosecution
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.