Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Carroll, Burdick & McDonough LLP, a California litigation and business law firm, elevated three attorneys to partner, including, in the San Francisco office, Richard Ames, a member of the Toxic Torts Group, and in the Los Angeles Office, Michael J. Mehall, a member of the Products Liability Group.
Ames focuses on litigation of asbestos matters on behalf of a diverse client mix including auto and equipment manufacturers, industrial and commercial contractors, and property owners. He has defended cases involving alleged exposure to products such as friction materials, aerospace adhesives, insulation, drywall products, and flooring mastics. Among Ames' trial highlights are obtaining dismissal from cancer cases, as well as successful resolution of mesothelioma and asbestosis matters, following opening statements.
Mehall, a litigator, focuses on defense of manufacturers against product liability and other major liability claims. He is particularly experienced in defending against claims involving automobiles and their component parts, including cases involving airbags, driveline components, steering, suspension, and overall crashworthiness claims. He has also defended cases involving motorcycles, recreational vehicles, elevators, escalators, electrical equipment, washing machines, and agricultural equipment. Mehall is an active member of the Defense Research Institute ('DRI') and an adjunct professor at California State University at Los Angeles.
Ames focuses on litigation of asbestos matters on behalf of a diverse client mix including auto and equipment manufacturers, industrial and commercial contractors, and property owners. He has defended cases involving alleged exposure to products such as friction materials, aerospace adhesives, insulation, drywall products, and flooring mastics. Among Ames' trial highlights are obtaining dismissal from cancer cases, as well as successful resolution of mesothelioma and asbestosis matters, following opening statements.
Mehall, a litigator, focuses on defense of manufacturers against product liability and other major liability claims. He is particularly experienced in defending against claims involving automobiles and their component parts, including cases involving airbags, driveline components, steering, suspension, and overall crashworthiness claims. He has also defended cases involving motorcycles, recreational vehicles, elevators, escalators, electrical equipment, washing machines, and agricultural equipment. Mehall is an active member of the Defense Research Institute ('DRI') and an adjunct professor at California State University at Los Angeles.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.