Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Leasing Hotline

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
March 26, 2008

Landlord Permitted to Cancel Lease After Tenant's Merger

A landlord may cancel a lease if the lease permits cancellation by the landlord after an assignment, and the tenant's merger into another corporation constitutes an assignment of a lease. Cellular Telephone Company, et al. v. 210 East 86th Street Corp., Index 101582/05, Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department, June 28, 2007.

Cellular's lease with the landlord provided that the tenant could not assign the lease without the landlord's approval and that the landlord could withhold approval for any reason, or no reason whatsoever. The lease further provided that the transfer or other disposition of more than 25% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Cellular or any corporate tenant or subtenant, or the transfer in excess of 25% of the total interest in any other entity would be deemed an assignment. An exception to acquiring the landlord's consent existed, permitting assignment of the lease to an 'affiliate, parent or successor of the tenant.' The lease further provided that the landlord could cancel it in the event of an assignment.

Several transactions occurred. In the first transaction, Cingular Wireless LLC acquired all of the stock of AT&T. Then LIN Corporation acquired 100% of Cellular, and Cellular ceased to exist. As a result, LIN became the tenant instead of Cellular. LIN Corporation then merged into an affiliated entity owned by LIN Broadcasting (formally wholly owned by AT&T and now wholly owned by Cingular Wireless). As a result, Cingular became the new tenant. Thereafter, the landlord sent a notice to Cingular of its election to cancel the lease.

Cingular commenced a declaratory action, seeking a declaration that the lease had not been validly cancelled. The court disagreed and held that the landlord had the right to cancel the lease. It held that the lease, in unambiguous terms, granted the owner the right to cancel upon a transfer or assignment. The court also considered previous case holding that the transfer of a corporation's ownership by merger with new stockholders constitutes an assignment of the joint venture interests of the original corporation.

Landlord Permitted to Cancel Lease After Tenant's Merger

A landlord may cancel a lease if the lease permits cancellation by the landlord after an assignment, and the tenant's merger into another corporation constitutes an assignment of a lease. Cellular Telephone Company, et al. v. 210 East 86th Street Corp., Index 101582/05, Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department, June 28, 2007.

Cellular's lease with the landlord provided that the tenant could not assign the lease without the landlord's approval and that the landlord could withhold approval for any reason, or no reason whatsoever. The lease further provided that the transfer or other disposition of more than 25% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Cellular or any corporate tenant or subtenant, or the transfer in excess of 25% of the total interest in any other entity would be deemed an assignment. An exception to acquiring the landlord's consent existed, permitting assignment of the lease to an 'affiliate, parent or successor of the tenant.' The lease further provided that the landlord could cancel it in the event of an assignment.

Several transactions occurred. In the first transaction, Cingular Wireless LLC acquired all of the stock of AT&T. Then LIN Corporation acquired 100% of Cellular, and Cellular ceased to exist. As a result, LIN became the tenant instead of Cellular. LIN Corporation then merged into an affiliated entity owned by LIN Broadcasting (formally wholly owned by AT&T and now wholly owned by Cingular Wireless). As a result, Cingular became the new tenant. Thereafter, the landlord sent a notice to Cingular of its election to cancel the lease.

Cingular commenced a declaratory action, seeking a declaration that the lease had not been validly cancelled. The court disagreed and held that the landlord had the right to cancel the lease. It held that the lease, in unambiguous terms, granted the owner the right to cancel upon a transfer or assignment. The court also considered previous case holding that the transfer of a corporation's ownership by merger with new stockholders constitutes an assignment of the joint venture interests of the original corporation.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.