Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
FILM PRODUCTION/DEFAMATION
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided that a legend at the end of the movie 'American Gangster' ' stating that events depicted 'led to the conviction of three quarters of New York City's Drug Enforcement Agency' ' was non-defamatory because it wasn't 'of and concerning' any particular individual. Diaz v. NBC Universal Inc., 08 Civ. 401(CM). 'American Gangster,' starring Denzel Washington and Russell Crowe, was based on the real-life story of one-time heroin dealer Frank Lucas, who cooperated with law-enforcement officials. The plaintiffs, who had worked for the DEA, filed suit on behalf of 'approximately 400 present and former Special Agents of the New York office of the United States Drug Enforcement Administration.' The statement in the movie about the convictions wasn't true, but the district court dismissed the complaint under the 'group libel doctrine.' The court noted: 'When a reference is made to a large group of people, no individual within that group can fairly say that the statement is about him, nor can the 'group' as a whole state a claim for defamation.'
In the Southern District of New York, courts apply the group-libel doctrine to suits brought by groups exceeding 60 members. But the Diaz plaintiffs argued that 'each of them can be identified by an average viewer because the film depicts as corrupt virtually the entire New York City narcotics law enforcement community.' The district court emphasized, however, that 'the legend did not cast a cloud over the entire (non-existent) 'New York City DEA'; it said that a fraction (albeit a substantial fraction) of the members of that group were convicted.'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?