Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Entertainment Law & FinanceLJN NewslettersNewsSections

Download Ruling May Raise Burden for Record Labels

By Thomas B. Scheffey
March 27, 2008
Those who download music to their computers now have two unlikely heroes. One is Janet Bond Arterton, a federal judge who sits in New Haven, CT. The other is Christopher David Brennan, a young Waterford, CT, resident who, among other artists, has reportedly downloaded songs by Billy Joel and Hootie and the Blowfish. Brennan is one of about 30,000 people who have been sued by the music industry in recent years for allegedly taking music from the Internet without paying for it.

Court records show that Brennan's mother was served a notice last year, but neither she nor Christopher showed up in court or offered any defense for downloading 2,071 songs. Meanwhile, lawyers from the Stamford, CT, offices of Robinson & Cole filed polished briefs on behalf of music companies Atlantic, Elektra, Interscope, Sony BMG Music Entertainment and BMG Music, explaining why their clients should receive as much as $750 for each song that Brennan allegedly downloaded illegally. They accused him of copying, distributing and 'making the recordings available' for distribution to others and asked for a default judgment.

Arterton denied the request. She concluded that the copying and distributing counts were not well pled. And as a matter of law, Arterton ruled, 'making available' is a dubious count. The judge said it was not enough to show that Christopher Brennan had music files on his computer. She said the industry had to prove he shared them with others. 'Without actual distribution, there is no violation of the distribution right,' Arterton noted in her decision, citing copyright scholar William F. Patry. Atlantic Recording Corp. v. Brennan, 3:07cv232 (JBA).

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The Bankruptcy Hotline Image

Recent cases of importance to your practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

How AI Has Affected PR Image

When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.