Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Download Ruling May Raise Burden for Record Labels
Court records show that Brennan's mother was served a notice last year, but neither she nor Christopher showed up in court or offered any defense for downloading 2,071 songs. Meanwhile, lawyers from the Stamford, CT, offices of Robinson & Cole filed polished briefs on behalf of music companies Atlantic, Elektra, Interscope, Sony BMG Music Entertainment and BMG Music, explaining why their clients should receive as much as $750 for each song that Brennan allegedly downloaded illegally. They accused him of copying, distributing and 'making the recordings available' for distribution to others and asked for a default judgment.
Arterton denied the request. She concluded that the copying and distributing counts were not well pled. And as a matter of law, Arterton ruled, 'making available' is a dubious count. The judge said it was not enough to show that Christopher Brennan had music files on his computer. She said the industry had to prove he shared them with others. 'Without actual distribution, there is no violation of the distribution right,' Arterton noted in her decision, citing copyright scholar William F. Patry. Atlantic Recording Corp. v. Brennan, 3:07cv232 (JBA).
Ray Beckerman, a partner in the New York law firm of Vandenberg & Feliu who has a blog called 'Recording Industry v. The People,' said in an interview that Arterton made clear that she believes the music industry needs to provide more proof in these downloading lawsuits. 'I think this is a very important decision,' said Beckerman. 'It's unlikely to have it come from a default decision.' Robinson & Cole's Brian E. Moran did not return repeated calls for comment.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?