Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As recently stated in the Fourth Annual Workplace Class Action Litigation Report, the number of decisions issued in wage and hour class actions in 2007 outstripped decisions in employment discrimination or benefits class actions, demonstrating the increasing popularity of wage and hour class action claims. Aside from the standard misclassification cases and more traditional off-the-clock claims, a recent trend has been claims for unpaid wages and overtime for time spent submitting to and/or waiting for a security check. For example, in January 2007, a group of Wackenhut Services, Inc. security guards filed suit for unpaid wages and overtime for time spent going through security screening required by the electric generating station at which they worked. Last August, a California federal court certified a class action for unpaid wages and overtime against Best Buy for all non-exempt employees who were subject to security checks. In October 2007 and January 2008, two additional class action lawsuits were filed against Best Buy in Pennsylvania and New York state courts, asserting that the employees are owed compensation for, among other things, time spent submitting to security checks.
With the ever-increasing focus on security, these claims create potential liability for a variety of employers, from airport vendors to power plants to retailers. Fortunately for these employers and others, the recent, yet limited, case law has held that such time is not compensable. Moreover, general wage and hour principles support this conclusion.
The Portal-to-Portal Act: Two Cases
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?