Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As recently stated in the Fourth Annual Workplace Class Action Litigation Report, the number of decisions issued in wage and hour class actions in 2007 outstripped decisions in employment discrimination or benefits class actions, demonstrating the increasing popularity of wage and hour class action claims. Aside from the standard misclassification cases and more traditional off-the-clock claims, a recent trend has been claims for unpaid wages and overtime for time spent submitting to and/or waiting for a security check. For example, in January 2007, a group of Wackenhut Services, Inc. security guards filed suit for unpaid wages and overtime for time spent going through security screening required by the electric generating station at which they worked. Last August, a California federal court certified a class action for unpaid wages and overtime against Best Buy for all non-exempt employees who were subject to security checks. In October 2007 and January 2008, two additional class action lawsuits were filed against Best Buy in Pennsylvania and New York state courts, asserting that the employees are owed compensation for, among other things, time spent submitting to security checks.
With the ever-increasing focus on security, these claims create potential liability for a variety of employers, from airport vendors to power plants to retailers. Fortunately for these employers and others, the recent, yet limited, case law has held that such time is not compensable. Moreover, general wage and hour principles support this conclusion.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.