Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Rediscovering Chapter 9
Even though Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code has been in effect for over 30 years, fewer than 100 cases have been filed during that time. Municipal bankruptcy cases ' or, more accurately, proceedings involving the adjustment of a municipality's debts ' are a rarity, compared with reorganization cases under Chapter 11. The infrequency of Chapter 9 filings can be attributed to a number of factors, including the reluctance of municipalities to resort to bankruptcy protection due to its associated stigma and negative impact, perceived or otherwise, on a municipality's future ability to raise capital in the debt markets. Also, Chapter 9's insolvency requirement, which exists nowhere else in the Bankruptcy Code, actually discourages municipal bankruptcy filings.
As the enduring fallout from the sub-prime mortgage disaster and the commercial credit crunch that it precipitated continue to paint a grim picture portending hard times ahead for the U.S. economy, municipalities are suffering from a host of troubles. Among them are skyrocketing mortgage foreclosure rates and a resulting loss of tax base, bad investments in derivatives and the higher cost of borrowing due to the meltdown of the bond mortgage industry and the demise (temporary or not) of the $330 billion market for auction rate securities ('ARS'), which municipalities have relied upon for nearly two decades to float inexpensive debt. The cost of borrowing in the ARS market has almost doubled since January 2008, according to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association. This confluence of financial woes is likely to propel an increasing number of municipalities to the brink of insolvency and beyond. This, in turn, may mean a significant uptick in the volume of Chapter 9 filings. In anticipation of Chapter 9's emergence from relative obscurity, it is important to understand what degree of utility federal bankruptcy law has in addressing municipal financial problems.
Constitutional Conflict
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?