Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Mechanic's liens are creatures of state law, allowing mechanics, materialmen, contractors, and others such as laborers or architects ('contractors') to place a lien for payment against real property after they have provided work or materials that constitute an improvement to real estate. Mechanic's liens are commonly placed on property when an owner contracts for work to be performed but fails to pay for the work, or when a general contractor fails to pay its subcontractors for work the subcontractors performed on the job, even if the failure to pay is the result of a dispute between the owner and the contractor over the work that was done. It is easy to see why, as an equitable matter, a contractor or supplier might be entitled to a lien, given the presumption that the property has become more valuable as a result of his work, but in practical terms, no owner wants his or her property subject to such a lien.
This is especially true when the owner is neither the party who contracted for the work nor is responsible for paying for it, i.e., when a tenant contracts for work to be performed on leased premises. In these cases, an owner might not even be aware that such work is taking place, and the question of 'fairness' necessarily becomes far more complex when a lien being placed on the owner's property is for improvements for which the tenant has contracted but not paid. Similarly, questions of fairness arise when a contractor seeks to enforce a lien for improvements made solely for the benefit of the tenant ' as is often the case with tenant-specific fit outs ' against an owner who has received little if any value for the improvements, but from whom payment for the improvements is being demanded in the form of a lien on his or her real estate.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.