Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz (New York): Jason B. Atlas has joined the firm as a partner in the health care practice. He was with Hayt, Hayt & Landau in Westbury, NY.
Saul Ewing (Princeton, NJ): Karen Palestini, previously a partner with Reed Smith in Princeton, has joined the business department and the health law practice group at Saul Ewing.
Hodes Milman (Irvine, CA): Three former med-mal and products liability attorneys from Irvine, CA-based Lopez, Hodes, Restaino, Milman & Skikos have left the firm to form the new firm of Hodes Milman. The founding attorneys ' Daniel Hodes, Jeffrey Milman and Kevin G. Liebeck ' have worked on plaintiff's cases involving fen-phen, Vioxx and Ephedra, as well as medical malpractice cases against the U.S. Department of Veteran's Affairs (VA). The new firm will concentrate on personal injury, wrongful death, product liability and medical malpractice litigation.
Gordon & Rees (San Francisco): Brooke Hartmann has joined the firm as an associate. Hartmann, who was previously with Lawson & Laski in Sun Valley, ID, is a member of the health care practice group. She graduated from Villanova University School of Law in 2005.
Covington & Burling (New York): Judith Tytel has joined Covington & Burling as special counsel in the FDA, pharmaceutical, and government investigations groups. She was previously assistant general counsel of Pfizer, Inc.
Foley & Lardner (San Francisco): Judith Waltz has been named co-chair of the firm's life sciences industry team. Waltz, a member of the health care industry team and the white-collar defense and corporate compliance practice, is a graduate of Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington.
Hodes Milman (Irvine, CA): Three former med-mal and products liability attorneys from Irvine, CA-based Lopez, Hodes, Restaino, Milman & Skikos have left the firm to form the new firm of Hodes Milman. The founding attorneys ' Daniel Hodes, Jeffrey Milman and Kevin G. Liebeck ' have worked on plaintiff's cases involving fen-phen, Vioxx and Ephedra, as well as medical malpractice cases against the U.S. Department of Veteran's Affairs (VA). The new firm will concentrate on personal injury, wrongful death, product liability and medical malpractice litigation.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?