Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bit Parts

By Stan Soocher
April 29, 2008

Artist Consultant/Unfair-Competition Claim

The California Court of Appeal granted an anti-SLAPP motion by long-time artist-rights consultant Thomas A. White to strike an unfair-competition suit filed against him by a law firm in the state. Gray & Associates P.C. v. White, B194898. White's stationery describes him as 'Consultant, Record and Music Pub-lishing Industries, Creative, Business and Legal Aspects.' The anti-SLAPP statute, Calif. Civ. Code Proc. Sec. 425.16, allows a party to strike a lawsuit that arises from the exercise of free speech. White, who isn't a lawyer, claimed exercise of free speech in speaking at entertainment-industry seminars. The court of appeal noted in its unpublished opinion: 'Indeed the majority of the allegations in Gray's complaint relate to White's speech in public forums on the issue of artists' intellectual property rights. ' Gray introduced no evidence to show that White furnishes advice to his clients or to the participants in seminars on subjects involving 'difficult or doubtful legal questions' whose resolution 'demand[s] the application of a trained legal mind.' Gray offered no testimony from any of White's clients describing advice they received from White. It offered no transcripts or notes from any of White's seminars reflecting the type of advice he gave there. And, it
failed to present testimony from any seminar participant who was led to believe by White's statements that he was licensed to practice law.'


Insurance/Intra-Band Litigation

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided that keyboardist Ray Manzarek and Doors Touring Inc. (DTI) could proceed with their breach-of-contract claim against their insurer for failure to defend them against suits brought by Doors drummer John Densmore and the estates of lead singer Jim Morrison and his girlfriend Pamela Courson. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., 06-55936. Densmore and the estates filed trademark-infringement actions over use of 'The Doors' name in conjunction with proposed tours by Manzarek and group guitarist Robby Krieger. St. Paul Fire had declined to defend the suits by citing a 'Field of Entertainment Limitation Endorsement' in Manzarek's and DTI's commercial general liability policies with the insurer. But in the suit by Manzarek and DTI against St. Paul, the appeals court found in part: '[T]he Underlying Lawsuits allege that Manzarek and DTI marketed products and merchandise at their concerts and on The Doors official Web site. The Underlying Lawsuits, however, are silent about what type of products and merchandise that Manzarek and DTI produced and marketed. For all St. Paul knew when it denied coverage, the products marketed by Manzarek and DTI included guitars, t-shirts, and perhaps (although we realize it is not likely) salad dressing bottles with The Doors logo and/or Morrison's likeness affixed to them. These allegations raised a potential for coverage under the Policies [advertising injury portions].'


Royalty Complaint/Ringtone and Download Licenses

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions Image

UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?