Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Appellate Court of Illinois decided that a license to use the trademark 'March Madness' 'to advertise, promote, and sell publications, videos, and media broadcasts' included the right to deliver on-demand video content to mobile wireless devices. Intersport Inc. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, 1-07-0626. Intersport, which produces sports programming, obtained a license in 1995 to use 'March Madness.' The sports programmer filed a declaratory action after entering into a deal in 2006 to deliver its video content to Sprint cell-phone customers.
The appellate court found the term 'media broadcast' in the license was limited to radio and TV distribution. But the court also noted 'that as early as 1979, the dissemination of video content to mobile wireless communication devices was foreseeable and that the term 'video' was used to refer to that content.
'We also find it significant that Intersport's license is exclusive and perpetual. The fact that there is no time limitation on the license, and no clause specifically excluding later-developed technology, suggests that the terms of the license should be interpreted broadly. ' [In addition,] it cannot be said that the term 'videos' is in any way modified or limited by the term 'media broadcasts.”
The Appellate Court of Illinois decided that a license to use the trademark 'March Madness' 'to advertise, promote, and sell publications, videos, and media broadcasts' included the right to deliver on-demand video content to mobile wireless devices. Intersport Inc. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, 1-07-0626. Intersport, which produces sports programming, obtained a license in 1995 to use 'March Madness.' The sports programmer filed a declaratory action after entering into a deal in 2006 to deliver its video content to Sprint cell-phone customers.
The appellate court found the term 'media broadcast' in the license was limited to radio and TV distribution. But the court also noted 'that as early as 1979, the dissemination of video content to mobile wireless communication devices was foreseeable and that the term 'video' was used to refer to that content.
'We also find it significant that Intersport's license is exclusive and perpetual. The fact that there is no time limitation on the license, and no clause specifically excluding later-developed technology, suggests that the terms of the license should be interpreted broadly. ' [In addition,] it cannot be said that the term 'videos' is in any way modified or limited by the term 'media broadcasts.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.