Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Store Not to Blame for Customer's Fall
A jury found that a grocery store was not to blame for a woman's fall on a recently mopped area, which resulted in a fractured elbow. In 2003, Linda Mars, then 64, was at a store owned by Brookshire Grocery Co. A customer in front of her in a checkout line dropped an item on the floor. Store employees mopped the area, creating a wet spot that caused Mars to slip and fall. Mars claimed that store employees failed to mark the dangerous area or otherwise prevent customers from walking across it. Brookshire Grocery countered that employees placed warning signs by the spot, and that Mars witnessed the spill and cleanup and was fully aware of the hazard. Mars v. Brookshire Grocery Co., No. 31625, Titus County District Court, 276th, TX, 11-07-2007.
Store Not to Blame for Customer's Fall
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.