Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Store Not to Blame for Customer's Fall
A jury found that a grocery store was not to blame for a woman's fall on a recently mopped area, which resulted in a fractured elbow. In 2003, Linda Mars, then 64, was at a store owned by Brookshire Grocery Co. A customer in front of her in a checkout line dropped an item on the floor. Store employees mopped the area, creating a wet spot that caused Mars to slip and fall. Mars claimed that store employees failed to mark the dangerous area or otherwise prevent customers from walking across it. Brookshire Grocery countered that employees placed warning signs by the spot, and that Mars witnessed the spill and cleanup and was fully aware of the hazard. Mars v. Brookshire Grocery Co., No. 31625, Titus County District Court, 276th, TX, 11-07-2007.
Store Not to Blame for Customer's Fall
A jury found that a grocery store was not to blame for a woman's fall on a recently mopped area, which resulted in a fractured elbow. In 2003, Linda Mars, then 64, was at a store owned by Brookshire Grocery Co. A customer in front of her in a checkout line dropped an item on the floor. Store employees mopped the area, creating a wet spot that caused Mars to slip and fall. Mars claimed that store employees failed to mark the dangerous area or otherwise prevent customers from walking across it. Brookshire Grocery countered that employees placed warning signs by the spot, and that Mars witnessed the spill and cleanup and was fully aware of the hazard. Mars v. Brookshire Grocery Co., No. 31625, Titus County District Court, 276th, TX, 11-07-2007.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.