Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Who Owns the Web Site? Preventing Disputes Between You and Your Web Designer
In the digital age, it is essential for a company to have a Web site to both promote its goods and services and to communicate with its customers. Many companies, rather than keeping their Web design, development, and hosting services in house, have hired an outside company to provide design and hosting services for their Web site. While this arrangement can save costs and result in a more professional final product, it also poses a number of risks when the company's relationship with its developer comes to an end. Possibly the greatest risk is a dispute over who owns the copyright in the Web site code developed by the outside developer. Even if the company provides all the actual content for its Web site to the developer, the developer may be able to claim copyright protection in the development work it has done, such as the HTML code that makes the content display correctly in a Web browser. If the developer, rather than the company that hired the developer, is deemed to own that copyright, the developer can seek to enjoin the company from further use of the Web site, potentially crippling the company's business. This article provides a brief exploration of these issues, including how to prevent such a dispute from arising and appropriate litigation strategies when such a dispute does occur.
Preventing a Dispute
The easiest way to prevent these sorts of disputes from arising is simply to cut them off at their beginning, by carefully drafting express agreements with the designer relating to the copyright in the Web site content that he will develop. As a general rule, the designer, as the creator of the source code for the Web site, would own the copyright in that content unless the designer is an employee of the hiring company or the agreement concerning the Web site's design expressly designated the work as one made for hire. 17 U.S.C. '101. To avoid any ambiguity, the designer's client should require that the designer sign an agreement that clearly states that the content being developed for the client's Web site constitutes a work for hire under the Copyright Act or that otherwise expressly acknowledges that the client will own all copyright in the Web site, and the designer should be required to place an appropriate copyright notice on the pages that he designs, indicating that the client owns the copyright. The client may also want to register the copyright in the Web content as a further pre-emptive measure, if such an agreement exists.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?