Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As anti-money laundering enforcement has become an international priority, financial institutions around the world increasingly rely on lawyers to help them navigate stringent anti-money laundering regulations enforced by criminal penalties. While the duty of lawyers representing financial institutions in the United States is almost solely toward their clients, in the European Union, lawyers have affirmative obligations to report suspected money-laundering activity to government authorities. In other words, lawyers may be involuntarily conscripted as enforcement agents or 'gatekeepers' at the institutions they represent. American lawyers in the European offices of U.S.-based 'international' law firms are not exempt. In some countries, they face criminal liability if they fail to follow 'know your customer' protocols or fail to report suspicious transactions. Meanwhile, in the United States, such 'gatekeeper' reporting obligations have met stiff resistance by the organized bar and have not been implemented.
Sometimes lost in the debate about 'gatekeeping' is the fact that lawyers in the United States have been, and continue to be, prosecuted for substantive violations of the money-laundering statutes. And as companies become both more sophisticated and more global in their operations, the prosecution possibilities expand. As one commentator noted: 'Lawyers are much more involved in advising clients about how to conduct their business than ever before due to the pervasiveness of the regulation of economic activity. When the lawyer moves from the courtroom to the boardroom, the possibility of a lawyer becoming enmeshed in questionable conduct increases substantially.' Henning, Targeting Legal Advice 54 Am. U.L. Rev., 669, 686 (2005).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.