Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Cameo Clips

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
July 30, 2008

COPYRIGHT PREEMPTION/MISAPPROPRIATION CLAIM

The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division, dismissed, on federal-preemption grounds, several state claims that were included with a copyright-infringement claim against songwriters Phil Vassar and Craig Wiseman. The suit alleged the defendants copied the plaintiffs' song 'Good Ol' Days to Come' for Vassar's hit record 'Good Old Days.' Brainard v. Vassar, 3:07-0929. 'Good Ol' Days to Come' had been pitched to Vassar's representatives. The district court noted of the plaintiffs' common-law misappropriation claim: 'The plaintiffs propose that the breach of an implied promise to pay for the use of the plaintiffs' song and to credit the plaintiffs as creators of the song are sufficient 'extra elements' to defeat [copyright] preemption. However, as the defendants point out, the source for the implied promises to pay and to provide credit is not, under the plaintiffs' allegations, any behavior on behalf of the parties but, rather, standard industry practice.'

The court then dismissed the plaintiffs' federal claim of unfair competition under the Lanham Act claim, explaining: '[T]he Lanham Act would provide a cause of action if the defendants had taken actual albums produced by the plaintiffs and labeled them as having been produced by the defendants, or if the defendants had labeled their own albums as having been produced by the plaintiffs when they were, in fact, produced by the defendants. ' It does not, however, provide a cause of action in the present setting, where the plaintiffs allege that the defendants stole portions of their song and recorded it themselves. ' That is the realm of copyright.'


COPYRIGHT TERMINATION/SUBSEQUENT ASSIGNMENT

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the daughter of Eric Knight, the author of 'Lassie Come Home,' didn't give up her statutory right to terminate a copyright assignment when she signed a second agreement in 1978 with the same company that she had assigned the movie, TV and radio rights in her 25% copyright interest in 'Lassie' in 1976. Classic Media Inc. v. Mewborn, 06-55385. Eric Knight died in 1943. In 1996, daughter Winifred Knight Mewborn sent a notice to Golden Books Family Entertainment, then current owner of the Lassie works, that she would be terminating her 1976 assignment. Golden Books rejected Mewborn's termination notice. Then in 2005, Mewborn's lawyer sent a letter to Classic Media, Golden Books' successor-in-interest, over a planned 'Lassie Come Home' movie. Mewborn wanted her share of income per the 1996 termination notice for exploitation of the Lassie rights.

Reversing and remanding a district court grant of summary judgment for Classic Media, the Ninth Circuit first noted: 'Despite (1) the express statutory language that termination of a pre-1978 transfer 'may be effected notwithstanding any agreement to the contrary,' 17 U.S.C. Sec. 304(c)(5); (2) Congress's clear intent to benefit authors and their heirs with additional years of copyright protection in the 1976 Act, as recognized by the Supreme Court; and (3) the omission of any language transferring termination rights in the 1978 Assignment or even a mention of the right of termination, the district court concluded that Mewborn intended to relinquish and impliedly waived her 'newly acquired right of termination' when she executed the 1978 Assignment.'

The appeals court concluded, however, 'that insofar as Classic urges us to hold that the 1978 Assignment transferred the motion picture, television and radio rights subject to Mewborn's termination rights, we cannot so hold because such an assignment would be void as an 'agreement to the contrary' pursuant to Sec. 304(c)(5). Moreover, all that Mewborn had at the time of the 1978 Assignment was future rights that would revert upon termination of the grant and the 1978 Assignment does not purport to grant those rights.'

COPYRIGHT PREEMPTION/MISAPPROPRIATION CLAIM

The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division, dismissed, on federal-preemption grounds, several state claims that were included with a copyright-infringement claim against songwriters Phil Vassar and Craig Wiseman. The suit alleged the defendants copied the plaintiffs' song 'Good Ol' Days to Come' for Vassar's hit record 'Good Old Days.' Brainard v. Vassar, 3:07-0929. 'Good Ol' Days to Come' had been pitched to Vassar's representatives. The district court noted of the plaintiffs' common-law misappropriation claim: 'The plaintiffs propose that the breach of an implied promise to pay for the use of the plaintiffs' song and to credit the plaintiffs as creators of the song are sufficient 'extra elements' to defeat [copyright] preemption. However, as the defendants point out, the source for the implied promises to pay and to provide credit is not, under the plaintiffs' allegations, any behavior on behalf of the parties but, rather, standard industry practice.'

The court then dismissed the plaintiffs' federal claim of unfair competition under the Lanham Act claim, explaining: '[T]he Lanham Act would provide a cause of action if the defendants had taken actual albums produced by the plaintiffs and labeled them as having been produced by the defendants, or if the defendants had labeled their own albums as having been produced by the plaintiffs when they were, in fact, produced by the defendants. ' It does not, however, provide a cause of action in the present setting, where the plaintiffs allege that the defendants stole portions of their song and recorded it themselves. ' That is the realm of copyright.'


COPYRIGHT TERMINATION/SUBSEQUENT ASSIGNMENT

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the daughter of Eric Knight, the author of 'Lassie Come Home,' didn't give up her statutory right to terminate a copyright assignment when she signed a second agreement in 1978 with the same company that she had assigned the movie, TV and radio rights in her 25% copyright interest in 'Lassie' in 1976. Classic Media Inc. v. Mewborn, 06-55385. Eric Knight died in 1943. In 1996, daughter Winifred Knight Mewborn sent a notice to Golden Books Family Entertainment, then current owner of the Lassie works, that she would be terminating her 1976 assignment. Golden Books rejected Mewborn's termination notice. Then in 2005, Mewborn's lawyer sent a letter to Classic Media, Golden Books' successor-in-interest, over a planned 'Lassie Come Home' movie. Mewborn wanted her share of income per the 1996 termination notice for exploitation of the Lassie rights.

Reversing and remanding a district court grant of summary judgment for Classic Media, the Ninth Circuit first noted: 'Despite (1) the express statutory language that termination of a pre-1978 transfer 'may be effected notwithstanding any agreement to the contrary,' 17 U.S.C. Sec. 304(c)(5); (2) Congress's clear intent to benefit authors and their heirs with additional years of copyright protection in the 1976 Act, as recognized by the Supreme Court; and (3) the omission of any language transferring termination rights in the 1978 Assignment or even a mention of the right of termination, the district court concluded that Mewborn intended to relinquish and impliedly waived her 'newly acquired right of termination' when she executed the 1978 Assignment.'

The appeals court concluded, however, 'that insofar as Classic urges us to hold that the 1978 Assignment transferred the motion picture, television and radio rights subject to Mewborn's termination rights, we cannot so hold because such an assignment would be void as an 'agreement to the contrary' pursuant to Sec. 304(c)(5). Moreover, all that Mewborn had at the time of the 1978 Assignment was future rights that would revert upon termination of the grant and the 1978 Assignment does not purport to grant those rights.'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Overview of Regulatory Guidance Governing the Use of AI Systems In the Workplace Image

Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.

Is Google Search Dead? How AI Is Reshaping Search and SEO Image

This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.

While Federal Legislation Flounders, State Privacy Laws for Children and Teens Gain Momentum Image

For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.

Revolutionizing Workplace Design: A Perspective from Gray Reed Image

In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.

From DeepSeek to Distillation: Protecting IP In An AI World Image

Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.