Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

<i>Quanta Computer, Inc., et al. v. LG Electronics, Inc.</i>

BY Matthew W. Siegal
July 30, 2008
On June 9, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Elecs., Inc., 128 S.Ct. 2109 (2008). (' Quanta'). Many observers believed that the Court would address whether, and to what extent, a party can contractually restrict application of the patent exhaustion doctrine, under which patent rights covering a product are extinguished when the product is sold without restriction. Instead, the Court's decision in Quanta appears to be relatively narrow, confirming that the sale of unpatented components can exhaust a system patent that is substantially, but not completely, embodied by those components, but leaving open the broader question of whether parties can contractually limit application of the patent exhaustion doctrine to the detriment of downstream good faith purchasers.

This article provides background and context as to how the Quanta case arose, examines the district court and Federal Circuit decisions in that case, and discusses the Supreme Court's analysis and holding, including the apparently limited scope of the Quanta decision.

Background: The Patents at Issue

Respondent LG Electronics Inc. ('LG') is the owner of the three patents at issue: U.S. Patent Nos. 4,939,641 (the ”641 patent'); 5,379,379 (the ”379 patent'); and 5,077,733 (the ”733 patent') (collectively, the 'LG Patents'). The '641 and '379 patents relate to systems whereby a microprocessor writes or reads data to or from memory. See LG Elecs., Inc. v. Bizcom Elecs., Inc., 453 F.3d 1364, 1377-78 (Fed. Cir. 2006). The '733 patent addresses a problem of resource allocation and provides a rotating priority system under which each device ' such as a
keyboard, monitor, mouse, hard drive and memory ' has priority access for a preset period of time to the data bus connecting the microprocessor seated in the chipset. Intel sold Quanta chips and microprocessors (the 'Intel Chips'), but not the standard hardware (e.g., buses and memory units) used to connect the Intel Chips in a working computer. None of the Intel Chips infringed the LG Patents until assembled with that hardware into a computer.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Yachts, Jets, Horses & Hooch: Specialized Commercial Leasing Models Image

Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.

Hyperlinked Documents: The Latest e-Discovery Challenge Image

As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.

Identifying Your Practice's Differentiator Image

How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.

Risks and Ad Fraud Protection In Digital Advertising Image

The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.

Turning Business Development Plans Into Reality Image

This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.