Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
You have recently been appointed General Counsel of a publicly traded Delaware corporation. A few months into your tenure, the Board asks whether the company should establish a policy for the automatic advancement of defense costs to officers or directors involved in company-related litigation. Your answer is that incorporating a non-discretionary advancement policy into the bylaws would be in the long-term best interests of the company.
A non-discretionary advancement provision would require the company to advance all legal expenses for any officer or director involved in any civil, criminal, administrative or investigative proceeding arising because the person is or was an officer or director of the company. Any advancement of defense costs would be conditioned upon their signing an undertaking to repay, as required by state law, and upon such other terms the company may choose to include in its advancement provision (see below). You know that advancing legal costs can be very expensive ' you have witnessed the dramatic increase in Department of Justice (DOJ) and SEC investigations into the conduct of officers and directors of public companies, not to mention the ever present reality of shareholder and derivative suits. Nevertheless, you think the risk of large legal bills is outweighed by significant potential benefits to the company.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.