Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Leasing Hotline

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
July 30, 2008

Pre-existing Fixtures

A tenant is not obligated to remove fixtures from the leased premises that were installed prior to the commencement of the lease. 2401 Walnut, L.P., v. American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., Civ. No. 07-1281, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Jan. 24, 2008.

The landlord, who had acquired the building from a third party, leased space in a building to American Express. Prior to the landlord's acquisition of the building, American Express had also acquired the stock and other assets of the third-party's business in a Stock Purchase Agreement, but not the building itself. In addition, prior to the commencement of the lease, certain items were installed in the building, including kitchen fixtures, specialized rooms, customized trade spaces, satellite dishes, customized fixtures, gym lockers, signage, piping from water purification systems and superfluous cabling and wiring throughout the building. The lease provided that American Express was required to remove all 'furniture, trade fixtures, office equipment and all other items of the Tenant's property' prior to vacating the building. Four days prior to the termination of the lease, the landlord sent a letter to American Express, requiring American Express to remove the above named items. American Express replied, stating it had no obligation to do so because it had not installed any alterations, additions, improvements or fixtures to the property. After several letters were exchanged, the landlord sent a contractor's estimate to American Express with the cost of removing the above named items. The landlord commenced an action against American Express for breach of lease and American Express moved for summary judgment. The court granted the motion, holding that the lease did not require American Express to remove items that were fixtures prior to the commencement of the lease. It considered that American Express provided sufficient evidence to prove that the items in dispute were fixtures and the landlord was unable to support a contrary conclusion.

Pre-existing Fixtures

A tenant is not obligated to remove fixtures from the leased premises that were installed prior to the commencement of the lease. 2401 Walnut, L.P., v. American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., Civ. No. 07-1281, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Jan. 24, 2008.

The landlord, who had acquired the building from a third party, leased space in a building to American Express. Prior to the landlord's acquisition of the building, American Express had also acquired the stock and other assets of the third-party's business in a Stock Purchase Agreement, but not the building itself. In addition, prior to the commencement of the lease, certain items were installed in the building, including kitchen fixtures, specialized rooms, customized trade spaces, satellite dishes, customized fixtures, gym lockers, signage, piping from water purification systems and superfluous cabling and wiring throughout the building. The lease provided that American Express was required to remove all 'furniture, trade fixtures, office equipment and all other items of the Tenant's property' prior to vacating the building. Four days prior to the termination of the lease, the landlord sent a letter to American Express, requiring American Express to remove the above named items. American Express replied, stating it had no obligation to do so because it had not installed any alterations, additions, improvements or fixtures to the property. After several letters were exchanged, the landlord sent a contractor's estimate to American Express with the cost of removing the above named items. The landlord commenced an action against American Express for breach of lease and American Express moved for summary judgment. The court granted the motion, holding that the lease did not require American Express to remove items that were fixtures prior to the commencement of the lease. It considered that American Express provided sufficient evidence to prove that the items in dispute were fixtures and the landlord was unable to support a contrary conclusion.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.